English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you had to choose between theese two evils: be super thin and scrawny or be obeese what would you choose?

Persoanlly I would go with extremely thin....

2007-11-07 13:42:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Diet & Fitness

Yes Plain healthy (is what I am) is best....this is a retorical question

2007-11-07 13:47:07 · update #1

10 answers

Thin and scrawny is much healthier! You wouldn't need to watch your weight or diet. You'd live longer! You could buy clothes right off the racks or from catalogues. And, besides, it's easier to dress to look fatter, than the alternative.

2007-11-07 15:52:27 · answer #1 · answered by Pinyon 7 · 1 1

I would choose thin, fat could turn to obese and then you would really have allot of complications, thin might have allot of problems, I'd rather be thin anyway

2007-11-07 21:53:41 · answer #2 · answered by dearmeohmy 4 · 1 0

I would prefer neither....both can be unhealthy...super thin can cuase bolimia or anarexia and abosesity can cuase cancer and MANY other problems....

But to answer your question given the choice between the two evils....I will go with everyone else ...super thin :P

2007-11-08 10:26:12 · answer #3 · answered by Ms. A 2 · 1 1

Neither. How about just plain healthy?

2007-11-07 21:45:45 · answer #4 · answered by Angel2000 4 · 0 0

super thin

2007-11-07 22:36:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

super thin

2007-11-07 21:53:20 · answer #6 · answered by jalyn 2 · 2 1

thin i guess good q

2007-11-08 07:56:45 · answer #7 · answered by balletguy 4 · 1 0

thin... then eat like theres no tomorrow =]

2007-11-07 21:49:19 · answer #8 · answered by albano 4 · 2 1

thin

2007-11-07 21:44:55 · answer #9 · answered by asdfgh 3 · 1 0

I prefer to be a scrawny @$$ then a fat @$$

2007-11-10 12:16:04 · answer #10 · answered by Saint Dre 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers