I was halfway liking some of the stuff Giuliani was saying, but now that Pat R has come out for him, I take it all back.
2007-11-07 07:26:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Acorn 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul gets my vote. Anybody that Pat Robertson endorses must be a worthless person. Whenever Giuliani gets in a jam he just screams "9/11!! 9/11!! I was the mayor!" He has no real platform and a pitiful ethics record.
Robertson is a huge hypocrite for supporting a pro-gay, pro-choice candidate on his 5th wife when he constantly preaches about the 'sins of homosexuality' and he is obviously pro-life.
What a couple of douchebags.
That and submitter is just a troll. But I guess I fell for it anyway.
2007-11-07 15:31:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sarah H 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Two very different subject so Ill only cover one. I dont care that Giuliani got Pat Robertsons endorsement nor do I care about his religious beliefs but I do take notice to his experience and certain policies such as border safety. So hes getting my vote, so far
2007-11-07 15:38:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Yuff 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
NO! Bush has been supported by the evangelicals and look where that got us! Besides, I thought Giuliani was pro-choice? Are the fundies gonna vote for him? I think not. Anyways, the point is, who cares who Pat Robertson supports?? He's crazy, probably a closet homosexual and drug addict and stealing money.
2007-11-07 15:27:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by aml0017 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Giuliani and Robertson can both eat a big floppy one. What a bunch of hypocritical opportunists. One exploits Jesus and the other exploits 9/11 what a great duo. How about we vote for Stalin and Hitler!
2007-11-07 15:26:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
No, I will not vote for him, because Giuliani is a globalist. He stands for everything that is antichrist, and Robertson is a fool to support him. That's why, as a Bible-believing Christian, I can only vote for Ron Paul next year.
2007-11-07 15:27:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by FUNdie 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
a book that has been re-written over thousands of years doesnt prove anything...if that was the case then you would also have to believe that the vampire lestat was real, and that batman protects gotham from evil, and all that jazz...books dont prove anything...and im not voting for anyone...our votes dont make a difference anyways, you should look into how the voting process actually works sometime
2007-11-07 15:27:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kiril 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ya'lls voting for Giuliani will verify your ancestry.
2007-11-07 15:30:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is supposed to be a separation of church and state and therefore any religious leader who comes out in support of any political candidate or any church or religious leader that brings political candidates into the church to campaign are violating the separation between church and state and therefore should lose all tax exempt status and should be estopped from favoring any candidate or side on a political issue. Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's and give unto God what is God's. Evangelists or Religious Leaders who get involved in promoting or endorsing politicians are promoting organized crime in my opinion. To donate to political campaigns or to allow politicians to speak in our churches is a clear violation of the separation of church and state and is a clear promotion of one religion or sect over another. Bring on the IRS and Senate investigations!
2007-11-07 15:30:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mindbender 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I may or may not vote for Rudy in the primaries, but I'll vote for whomever is the Republican nominee in November.
One exception, if Ron Paul is the republican nominee, I'm leaving the country.
2007-11-07 15:31:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by mzJakes 7
·
1⤊
1⤋