English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it pretty much the same?

2007-11-07 07:02:09 · 39 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

39 answers

I prefer uncut. Its much better in many ways... And i never understood why it would be considered gross looking... I find the uncut much more unappealing to look at to be honest.
But I think us women have some gaul to say that an uncut looks gross.... Have you looked at what you have lately? No beauty prize's given for that either... There is a reason why its called bumping uglies....
It shouldn't matter as long as it works.... :)

2007-11-07 07:09:17 · answer #1 · answered by W 3 · 6 2

It makes no difference so far as the guy has good personal hygiene, ie, cleaning under the foreskin.

When having sex, you can't tell the difference.

Americans and Jewish men are really the only males who have circumcisions. Circumcision is not a common practice outside the United States that I know of. I am not sure about Islamic men.

2007-11-07 07:42:54 · answer #2 · answered by Deana 4 · 3 0

It doesn't matter to me if a guy is circumcised or not. It's the penis's natural state so it doesn't look weird to me. During sex, it feels the same (being safe and wearing a condom that is). The only real concern is for the health of the guy. A little extra care needs to be taken where hygiene is concerned, but it only takes an extra second or two to pull back the foreskin and wash properly.

2007-11-07 07:13:01 · answer #3 · answered by Erin 7 · 4 0

Uncircumcised is normal. Nothing missing. Don't understand the American obsession with cosmetic genital surgery. It is not dirty or anything and most of the girls here it seems have been culturally trained to think "ew" even with no experience.

2007-11-07 20:55:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Make sure they keep clean before they have you perform sexual activities. But, nothing wrong for not being circumcised. For sexual feeling, they are the same.

2007-11-07 07:06:45 · answer #5 · answered by Ann 2 · 4 1

No, men who are uncircumcised have to take care of it, such as cleaning it and staying away from women who are unclean.... well that goes for anyone. But they have to pay extra attn to keeping the foreskin skin to prevent from getting or causing infections. Also, depending on the guy it's an extra 1/2 in or more

2007-11-07 07:05:46 · answer #6 · answered by Sassy Shut Your Mouth 5 · 2 3

I'd say they're neither muslim, jewish or American. In other words, they're the majority. So you should meet a foreigner or a recent immigrant that is neither muslim or jewish and you will see for yourself.

In erection it looks/feels pretty much the same. At rest, you can see the foreskin, but who cares about it at rest anyway?

2007-11-07 07:08:37 · answer #7 · answered by Millie 5 · 1 2

what difference will it make to u circumcision is to keep it cleaner and also it becomes less sensitive that's all it has little to do with delay or holding power

2007-11-07 07:21:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I think there are a lot of guys out there wondering what makes the difference.....as for me I have never had any personel experience with one not circumsized....

2007-11-07 07:08:08 · answer #9 · answered by mrsbsy06 2 · 2 2

it's the same in the sense of having sex with them, i mean it doesn't feel any different. i think it's a little more nasty though because there are more chances for them to get infected and have more germs down there. being circumsized doesn't really do anything, it just makes guys have extra skin down there, and it's a little more unsanitary, but nothing big.

2007-11-07 07:05:41 · answer #10 · answered by Angel*Eyesz 3 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers