Um. Isn't intelligent design (the PC term for creationism) based on the belief in a higher power?
Sure there are holes in evolution, but its a testable theory. We don't know everything about evolution but we learn more and more over time.
Maybe you could try proving the existance of a higher power first. That should be a start. Write God a letter and ask how to do this assignment.
2007-11-07 05:11:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Whishkey Bottom. 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
"There has been a challenge that I wish to undertake to show that Intelligent Design is real science and follows the scientific method."
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
*Snif* sorry I couldn't help it...
Tell you what, if you DO manage to do this (and good luck to you) in an honest and scientific method. Publish. You'd be the first person in history to provide evidence of creationism.
But be prepared for failure, you're starting from a false assumption after all; that god is real.
2007-11-07 05:15:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Take a look at these:
http://www.arn.org
http://www.discovery.org
http://www.idthefuture.com
http://www.uncommondescent.com/
And for those who put so much faith in peer-review, check these out: http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2640&program=CSC%20-%20Scientific%20Research%20and%20Scholarship%20-%20Science
http://www.overwhelmingevidence.com/oe/blog/quizzlestick/has_i_d_provided_peer_reviewed_testable_claims
Also, you need to get the book: The Politically Incorrect Guide To Darwinism And Intelligent Design, by Jonathan Wells, Ph.D.
http://www.amazon.com/Politically-Incorrect-Darwinism-Intelligent-Design/dp/1596980133/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-7898152-8672833?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1194461207&sr=8-1
I would also take the time to watch some of these:
http://www.theapologiaproject.org/video_library.htm
Go here to answer some FAQs:
http://www.theapologiaproject.org/2003.09.ID_FAQ.pdf
http://www.arn.org/id_faq.htm
2007-11-07 05:40:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Questioner 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Use the Fibinacci sequence as a non-biblical support of evidence left for a universal design
You can test it in application to biology, astronomy, etc. Should prove very interesting
2007-11-07 05:09:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cuchulain 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I just saw a DVD entitled "irreducible complexity". It was by about 6 established scientists discussing how "evolution" as a theory to explain the origin of life, or the origin of intelligent life, falls woefully short. Darwin said that if there was a case of "irreducible complexity" (like a mousetrap which needs 5 unrelated parts working in harmony to work) that the "theory" of evolution would collapse. Good luck. logic doesn't get very far against the religion of Atheism/Evolution.
2007-11-07 05:13:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by hasse_john 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Sure! Lemme see if I can get Bugs Bunny on the line... I'll edit this after I've reached him :)
(I can't believe you felt the need to add that last line about not allowing Biblical references. Wow!!)
2007-11-07 05:09:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by I'/\/\AZILLA2 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Proving that intelligent design is false regardless of method used dosen't help IE .
2007-11-07 05:24:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Islam Is A Dangerous Cult 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
So you want to show that ID is scientific by falsifying it? That's awesome.
I would say that vestigial organs offer good counter-evidence to ID claims.
2007-11-07 05:09:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eleventy 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Go to http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/ Nova is doing a show on Id next week this site has a whole lot of info on ID.
2007-11-07 05:10:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Small Victories 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
What have you gotten yourself into, my friend?
Good luck!
I'd really like to help you, but there is no supporting evidence.
2007-11-07 05:09:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋