English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok so we are supposed to believe adam and eve were the first and only two people on earth. How is that possible if incest is wrong and everyone was made by these two people? we would all be related so therefore all sinners. All going to hell as they say including all priests, believers etc.

2007-11-07 02:29:21 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

13 answers

As you may recall, God gave them all commandmetn at the very biginning to 'Be fruitful and Multiply ... " - His very first directive, in fact!
Obviously, incest when Man was first created, was not an issue.


Try getting your teeth around this:
It is an even bigger hallenge for you:


I'm glad you brought this topic up, also, because it allows me to call upon your response to the work I recently published via Xulon Press.com, “TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE!!” [by Denis Towers], which, my experience has been, during its brief and limited exposure so far, has proven a powerful faith-promoter.
It actually illustrates, following a 9 year research into the fact – one Heavenly-inspired [I believe] – a discovery I made 10 years ago, being a long-time specialist in Kinesiology and applied anatomy, that the typical ground snake presents as the precise antithesis of Man in ALL aspects, both – anatomically-functionally and psycho-behaviorally.
For many, this has proven quite an eerie finding!
But once one has recovered from the sheer gravitating shock of this perfectly central, yet simple, discovery, it is usually immediately realized that only a true and absolute brilliant Master mind could possibly have engineered such – that such an outcome could only be the result of meaningful deliberation and conscious decision, and, therefore, that “random mutation” [per the belief of ‘evolutionary theory’] certainly wasn't 'random", if at all!!
Overall, it has proven a highly intriguing, most fascinating and enormously revelatory study.
Of course, this finding not only tends to disprove 'evolution', but it also Powerfully supports the Biblical Adam and Eve account, wherein it was the very serpent – through whom Satan (a spirit only) was able to speak to Adam and Eve in the natural world – that same serpent which first set Man in opposition to God; and it was the serpent, therefore, that God chose to “curse above all the beasts of the field” [per description in holy writ] for its trouble.
As indicated, as 'fruits of its labor', God cursed the serpent 'above all the beasts of the field' ... hence making significant changes to it (a passing few recorded in scripture).
What this study appears to show is that those changes made were so as to symbolize or represent this very act of opposition of the snake as described – an act which effectively became the most transcendent single decision and most significant event among ALL events in the entire history and progress of Man, barring the All and Most important of all – that of redemption from this very event – the Atonement of Christ Himself.
Meantime, as stated, it seems that the Creator has temporarily signified, in effect, the serpent’s complete opposition to Man and God [in whose image we were created] … so that, in typical life-ironic fashion, what has tended to be the most unbelievable account concerning Man in the entire holy record: that which claims that a snake spoke to a man (all the more so since today the creature cannot even vocalize) – has become the very one that we have most scientifically proven took place (or supported)!!!!!
… but isn’t this, though, just so typical of the genuine ironies of real life?!

It has, indeed, become a most intriguing, diabolical world since the snake expressed its opposition to Man and God.
It has, likewise, been a most encompassing, intriguing and faith-promoting study to undertake.
From the reader’s viewpoint, I have known people so inspired by the work as to read it twice in the first week or so that they had accessed it.

I personally invite you to search it for yourself, and inform me of your experience.
Thank you very much.

Source(s)
Two Birds ... One Stone!!
by Denis Towers
published Xulonpress.com 2007

2007-11-07 23:39:18 · answer #1 · answered by dr c 4 · 0 0

I have read the bible. I think science has a crucial part in this section. If you read genesis god created the heavens and the earth as well as man in his image within the 6 days. It was not until later, that god created the first SOUL, capable of maintaining the earth. What does this mean? Science could be right. The first cavemen were in fact like animals. They were not capable of tilling the land and farming.

Adam was the first Soul who had knowledge of the earth. In essence, this is when farming started. Formed from the dust of the earth, Adam had a bond with the earth to dress it and to keep it. This argument makes sense on a number of levels. That would mean that there were people around at that time, but did not have a soul like Adam and Eve. That would allow cain and abel to find "partners".

One thing people don't seem to think about is how man just one day knew the secrets of agriculture. I got this from reading the bible for myself.

2007-11-07 02:45:19 · answer #2 · answered by modrealist 2 · 0 0

Obviously, if no other choice is possible, incest is permissible.

But this is true whichever model of the universe one chooses to believe. In the case of evolution, as new species arose, there was necessary incest between the original members of each new species until, in a generation or two, there would be enough individuals to better diversify the gene pool.

2007-11-07 02:37:46 · answer #3 · answered by mzJakes 7 · 0 0

Actually, all people came from Noah and his three sons. Laws of incest didn't come into play until the Torah was given to Moshe at Sinai. Going to hell is another myth I'll blow a hole in. Hel is the daughter of Loki. Greek and Norse mythology. Your inheritance is either eternal life or eternal death. Shalom.

2007-11-07 02:41:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The creation story is not consistent nor factual so taking it as literal or metaphorical truth is nearly impossible unless you have "faith blinders" on.

Technically, we are all descended from Adam and Eve and all are under the curse that was given to them, so yes, if person was born and died without hearing about Jesus or God, they would be condemned to hell, if this mythology was true.

2007-11-07 02:39:10 · answer #5 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 0 0

noo what is wrong as the you are talking about the bilogey fact does not have any thing to do with spritrual and that is why everry word has own meaning so even one hand has diffrent finger size name so sitll we belive it as hand in interdepandent state,

2007-11-07 17:10:15 · answer #6 · answered by tongbahinee 2 · 0 0

Ada and Eve.

2016-05-28 06:38:01 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Or you're a blind faith type that believes every thing written or told to be true! Do you really believe everything? It's a STORY, enough said. TRUTH.

2007-11-07 02:36:47 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. Len 5 · 0 2

That doesnt scare me so much.....no other planets even remotely like earth out there......I find strange

2007-11-07 02:35:20 · answer #9 · answered by MNgirl@thebeach 4 · 0 0

Lost...not believers because believers are forgiven of all sins. You sin is cast away as far as the east is from the west...

2007-11-07 02:34:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers