English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

I do believe so. Most demos want to succeed and bring our troops home. The longer we are there the more will die. They want us out of their country and that's y there's so much killing now. I pray our troops do come home

2007-11-07 01:17:45 · answer #1 · answered by A soldiers wife 4 · 1 1

hmmm lets see.. how long have we been having middle eastern problems? well, there have actually been middle eastern problems for hundreds if not thousands of years.. but since we are currently big dog on the block, we have the big target.. i mean I am sure terrorists would get worldwide headlines for years on end if they flew an airplane into the Armenian embassy in bumfukt, Afghanistan. Yeah... i can see all the headlines and great recruiting for their big war with the Armenian Army after the invasion.. or not. But go after the US with something they have to respond to... still think this is a democratic vs republican problem?

2007-11-07 13:48:08 · answer #2 · answered by Rafael P 4 · 0 0

No. The middle east is always going to be a problem that has to be managed by what ever administration is in the White House.

2007-11-07 08:36:06 · answer #3 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0 0

none have solved it yet and they have had 2 presidents and 12 years to try since 1976. both of them just created a atmosphere that made it worse.
until the Muslims can eliminate Israel the problem won't go away in the middle east. if they ever do get rid of Israel they will just move the problem put of the middle east to a different region. it is the religion not the region.

2007-11-07 07:17:07 · answer #4 · answered by darrell m 5 · 0 1

I fail to see how either party could be better than the other for solving your problems in the Middle East - some of those problems being long term and some even unsolvable.

Both sides claim they're better for it, both have their obvious advantages and disadvantages. Most people answering this question are solidly tied to a particular party and bound to give stupid, biased answers, so you're better off trying to reason it out yourself. Unless you already have your own solid opinion on the matter, in which case your question would constitute a pointless rant.

2007-11-07 06:51:05 · answer #5 · answered by Gotta have more explosions! 7 · 1 1

If your foreign policy is based on the assumption: "Israel is always right, Arabs always wrong", then no. A democratic presidency means more of the same.

2007-11-07 09:33:33 · answer #6 · answered by Philip L 4 · 1 0

Carter made them worse.
Clinton tried to buy peace with the Palestinians and failed,they took the money and made bombs.

So no,probably make things worse.

2007-11-07 06:54:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

unilateral surrender does NOT encourage patriotism or national pride, its naked raw cowardice and simply emboldens and encourages our enemies. until the democrats understand that no problems will go away. the problems in the middle east will expand into chaos and that clearly is the reason why,.

2007-11-07 05:54:29 · answer #8 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 5 1

Republican or Democratic nothing will change the Americans policy is the one which must change and then middle east problems might change watch out your policy program created these problems and your different administration became like a MAFIA

2007-11-07 05:43:23 · answer #9 · answered by awgaa 3 · 1 4

no, the heart of the problem is the fact that we have alowed ourselves to be dependnet on mid eastern oil and nither party has done much to change this.

2007-11-07 05:22:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers