Does god excist?

Question

from science view

Answer 1

yes. My definition of God is that which exists and never stops existing - ever. Primal, eternal, changeless, deathless, formless, beginingless, endless, conscious, true. That which enables and activates this entire Universe, that which contains everything but is boundless and uncontained.

Even the world's great scientists and thinkers like Albert Einstein believed in God. The simple reason: the complexity of the Universe is too great and confounding to believe that this universe is a masterfully crafted but aimless ship without a captain.

However, I dispute with a lot of people who try to assign human personality traits to God - like jealousy and direct involvement in the affairs of man. Whatever God is - she definitely doesn't fit into a template explanation in anyone's holy book.

Answer 2

The complexity of our planet points to a deliberate Designer who not only created our universe, but sustains it today. The human brain's complexity shows a higher intelligence behind it. There is an intelligence to it, the ability to reason, to produce feelings, to dream and plan, to take action, and relate to other people. How does one explain the human brain? "Chance" or "natural causes" are insufficient explanations.

With out God we are saying:

Nothing produces everything

Non life produces life

Randomness produces fine tuning

Chaos produces information

Unconsciousness produces consciousness

Non-reason produces reason

None of which makes sense!

We've learned a lot through science since the Civil War. So many seem to be still trying to apply Darwin's 19th century thinking to a 21st century reality, and it doesn't work. Explanations from the steamboat era are no longer adequate in the world of cosmology, physics, astronomy, biochemistry, biology in this age. The only option left is that God exists!

Answer 3

Descarte tried to prove the existance of God through logical arguments. He didn't do a great job, but not bad. (he made too many assumptions)

BTW Descarte and Darwin were very religious men and scientist. The both set out to show that science and religion could coexist.

Answer 4

Science has neither proved nor disproved the existence of God. If you get into very high level science such as quantum physics you will find that things of a spiritual nature become possible. Other evidence suggests the "possibility" of levels of existence beyond what we can perceive. I suggest reading "Flatland" by Edwin Abbott. This will begin your journey. Open your mind...

Answer 5

Does the word "excist" exist?

Answer 6

Do you know of any scientific evidence of God's existence?

I am sure many scientists believe in god(s) on faith, but there is no scientific reason to do so.
To save time for anyone planning on flooding my e-mail-
The Watchmaker's argument, Pascal's Wager, the Bible and "Just look around you- God must exist" are not scientific proof.

Answer 7

The only view about God existing that matters to me is MINE>
He exists.

Answer 8

God exists but he doesn't excist.....if that's a word...

Answer 9

you would have to use a statistician and an archaeologist and sit them down to create probability formulas for the prophecies in the bible. Then you would have to make a case that the probabilities are similar to those found in DNA science that we accept.

Answer 10

There is no evidence even suggesting to the existence of any power greater than that of humans, etherical or otherwise, in the universe; only conjecture, superstition and tradition.