the author is absolutely wright.coz in today's world we see & believe only that what media wants us to;& never even try to go to the root of the matter.the thing which we should remember is that the whole media is under the control of America & Israel,the one who are always ready to harm muslims & creat misconceptions among people abt Islam.
if the thing is abt Osama,most of us are unaware of fact that USA has given training to him for their greed & in the name of Osama they r fullfiling their wishes.
it is mental setup of people, that if Osama do some thing it is being linked with Islam coz his name is of muslims.But if Bush do something no one links it with chistanity.Do we??
Bal thakrey,people calleds him God;even after being aware of his deeds.
i don't know what Hinduism says abt such people;but i can say hindus worship them as God.
2007-11-07 03:27:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by humaira k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Becket's wikipedia quote a few answers back is spot on. There are multiple possible layers of meaning to the title. The play is largely about the dangers of loose talk. In both the plot and sub-plot, characters lives and reputations are seriously effected by overheard words. In the main plot, lies told by Don John cause Claudio to (falsely) believe that his fiance, Hero, is "an approved wanton, a common stale" a more polite way of saying "*****." In the subplot, lies overheard by Beatrice and Benedick cause the two of them to fall in love with each other. Beatrice, of all people, should know better, as she herself says "words are but wind." In this regarding, "nothing" could be refering to the words and lies spoken by all the characters. After all, in the end, it was all a big kuffufle about lies. Furthermore, regarding Hero's genitalia, the question of a woman's virginity was a major thing when it came to marriage since that was the only way for a man to be sure that any children were his. Since Claudio refuses to wed Hero on account of the fact that he believes she is not a virgin, it could be said, with some justification, that this is "Much Ado About Genitalia." To expand a little on the Wikipedia quote, "thing" was common slang for male genitalia. In Hamlet, the title character insults the king by saying "The king is a thing." Sort of like calling the guy a ****, if you'll pardon my French. Thus "No Thing" would be the female genitalia. Anyhow, I hope this is helpful!
2016-05-28 04:06:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
While the article is a good indication of what the average muslim undoubtedly feels, it is ignoring the fact that a lot of terrorists claim the Muslim faith is what tells them to behave the way they do. A sensible person realizes that fanatics are fanatics, regardless of their religion, but you can't separate the fact that Osama and others like him have claimed their cause is Holy because of whatever Muslim teaching they use. I believe that the average Muslim is no more like Osama than the average Christian is like a white supremacist. It doesn't stop them from trying to use the Bible to justify their insanity either.
2007-11-06 09:07:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rebeckah 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
It was good to read the article. I believe we have a lot of serious problems in thie world, that are not rooted in religion. These problems tend to create fetile ground for producing criminal, and terrorists. All countries in this world, have some people who tend to be extreme. We need to get together with others, no matter what they believe in, to deal with the very serious problems of this world.
2007-11-06 08:36:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by astrogoodwin 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The article seems to imply that the rapid spread of Islam in the first two centuries after Mohammed was not carried out by warfare. That is historically inaccurate. Like almost all human beings throughout history, Muslims have used political violence when it seemed likely to further their aims.
2007-11-06 08:29:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by cosmo 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I do believe Osama Bin Laden speaks for "himself" and not for all the Muslims. Osama is a disturbed man because of his hatred in his heart. He "blaspheme's" the Muslim's ALLAH, and he will be held accountable for his sins against the Almighty God. Any country would take ALL measure's to protect their own country. Even the USA. These are all signs of the "End Times". Be alert! Be watchful! Look toward the heaven's and hold your faith! Do NOT harm and kill the innocent righteous ones! Protect the people of the God Almighty! WE ALL LOVE GOD ALMIGHTY!
2007-11-06 10:07:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would say that as long as those 'so called terrorists' continue to use those words in the 'bad' meaning and to blow up people (and other Muslims) in the name of their kind of Islam, you will have trouble convincing people that what they hear from fanatical Mullahs and gun wielding terrorists is not at least part of the truth about your religion.
That's called propaganda and it is right now propelled by the 'so called terrorists' more than anyone else. I believe that is their goal.
2007-11-06 08:28:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by didi 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Seriously, I have no genuine comment about that link.
2007-11-06 08:24:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
sorry no time to go Thur such links especially i am afraid of viruses
2007-11-06 09:23:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Propaganda? Methinks thou doth protest too much.
2007-11-06 08:48:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by wanda3s48 7
·
0⤊
0⤋