English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i was told by a friend at work that years ago a car would be able to pass its MOT without an engine i told him i thought he was talking out of his hat, can anyone prove him right/wrong

2007-11-06 07:10:56 · 9 answers · asked by richard288uk 1 in Cars & Transportation Safety

9 answers

I don't think so because part of the MOT is to check the exhaust emmissions.No engine=no emmissions check=FAIL

2007-11-06 07:15:29 · answer #1 · answered by DARREN A 4 · 1 1

that's certainly an somewhat sturdy question. If a automobile had a catalytic converter whilst new, then it *could* fail any MOT without one. whether, you have replaced the engine with an older variety one, that did no longer have a catalytic converter. i can confirm the place you're coming from, however the automobile replaced into equipped with a undeniable engine, and cat, for a reason. to shrink risky emissions. there is not any getting around the incontrovertible fact that the automobile could have a cat, in spite of what engine is equipped. there's a series emissions parent for that automobile, and with an older engine equipped it won't meet those emission figures. I even have heard, and that i do no longer comprehend if it is real, that MOT testers are human, and might grant suggestion previously a try. some testers would have differing evaluations on the problem.

2016-11-10 11:30:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Zanahori is on the right lines.In the past a car could be tested for an mot without an engine,but it was usually to see how bad the corrosion and the rest of the car was?And if it was going to be worthwhile to fit an engine?Ive tested a car like that with a seized engine a long time ago now,but it couldnt pass an mot like that.

2007-11-06 07:48:37 · answer #3 · answered by JOHN K 4 · 0 0

Many years ago, the MOT did not include exhaust tests. It is conceivable that a car could have passed even if it did not have an engine to get it to the garage! It would have a battery to put the lights one and drive the wiper blades. But why waste the fees on a car that would not go on the road?

2007-11-06 07:23:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes it would have been possible as i worked at a garage that did it .Mot tester said as long as the brakes still pulled up on the rollers ok .
Because the vehicle would have less weight and also there would be no servo assistance.
Just like if your windscreen is damaged remove it and the wipers and arms therefore it no longer falls into the testing criteria.
PASS and ADVISE.

2007-11-06 08:58:46 · answer #5 · answered by Marvellouso 2 · 0 0

part of the test is to check the emission on the engine,so i don't see how a car cold pass it,unless he knows something none of us do,it would have to be ran to pass,so i think that would rule it out and it not having any engine at all in it,good luck on this one.

2007-11-06 08:24:17 · answer #6 · answered by dodge man 7 · 0 0

car has to be running to do emissions test and to do a brake test it is put on a rolling road to check brake efficiency..... So I think your friend could be the next halitosis kid

2007-11-07 07:35:51 · answer #7 · answered by lee g 4 · 0 0

car has to be running to do an emission test no engine no emission test car will fail

2007-11-06 07:16:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

you could before emission test.

2007-11-06 10:12:55 · answer #9 · answered by HaSiCiT Bust A Tie A1 TieBusters 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers