It seems pointless to defend yourself or attack a position utilizing the same publication that others find as not a defendable position. That makes the arguments non-sequitur. If the Bible's quotes are so old and re-translated that they have to be constantly studied and interpreted, shouldn't there be another way to find communication and common ground?
Should not the pro-Bible types have access to other publications including ones NOT based on the Bible to quote? Or is the Bible this exclusive?
2007-11-06
05:19:11
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Your Uncle Dodge!
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality