English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Im not a feminist, and I dont like them either, but Im willing to side with them if it means exposing religion. fact is, in a few years, women wont need men anymore because the sperm wont be needed to make a woman pregnant. mice have already been created this way. in certain animal species, there are no males.
maybe in several thousand years, humans will no longer bare male descendants. what will this make religion look like? jesus and mohammad were useless to humanity? its all just biology and nothing spiritual?

2007-11-06 04:58:00 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

2 answers

We can already generate DNA from the basic 4 proteins and there are people working toward a designer additional chromosome where you could turn on and off various features that you would pass on to your children. Parthenogenesis - why not? A human egg has already been shown to be susceptible to being stimulated into dividing without a sperm so why not?

2007-11-06 05:05:11 · answer #1 · answered by Demetri w 4 · 0 0

What does Jesus have to do with procreation? That was going on before he came and continues after he has returned to heaven. If procreation was his purpose, then he failed because he left no physical descendants.

What he did do was to answer the questions like: Why am I here, what is the meaning of life, what is my purpose in life, how do I reach my full potential, who is God, how do I relate to him, what happens after death, etc.

Those questions will still need to be answered, whether a person is born with one parent or two.

So everything that Jesus came to accomplish will still be needed should your prediction come true.

2007-11-06 05:09:34 · answer #2 · answered by dewcoons 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers