English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

I would say that would be true. We also can't control the 'other' driver.

2007-11-06 08:23:51 · answer #1 · answered by what u talkin' bout? 7 · 0 0

To me, this statement is, clearly FALSE.

A driver is responisble to compensate for such risk factors, usually by slowing down when ANY risk factor is added, such as weather, roadway, traffic, darkness, construction, etc.

That is how the added risk is managed. Slower speed means more time to react to the situations that may be presented in such conditions.

If your teachers give you any argument about this, tell them Vince M gave you this answer.

I will also add this, for further discussion. In ANY situation where the driver cannot control risk, he should not be driving. Examples: Zero visibility, Exhaustion or lack of sleep, intoxication, the vehicles completely unsound mechanical condition.

2007-11-06 14:04:59 · answer #2 · answered by Vince M 7 · 0 0

As the question is asked, the answer is True but obviously it is up to every driver to minimise whatever risks there may be by careful and sensible driving in accordance with prevailing conditions.

2007-11-10 02:09:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

True

2007-11-10 02:49:21 · answer #4 · answered by Wylie Coyote 6 · 0 0

sounds true to me...are you using us to do your driver's ed homework?

2007-11-06 03:24:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

the other driver

2007-11-06 03:37:55 · answer #6 · answered by koma 6 · 0 0

true

2007-11-06 03:27:42 · answer #7 · answered by fire_n_ice723 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers