EDIT-im doing this based on teenager gangs! and how they get to that situation anyways. Also i think that they should defo have a long jail sentence.
Well i think its all about how the person was brought up. this is not always entirely true but some kids who dont grow up without a father especially boys have not got a father figure to tell them off when they do wrong and women are alot more soft then men, and i really dont mean this in a offensive way. i think first off it would help kids to have a mother and father in their life, i mean some kids without a father lead a very respectable life. I think children should always be punished for their bad actions. i live around the corner from a council estate and theres this one man who lets his 8 and 4 yr old daughter go out until whatever time they choose and the 8 yr old got abused by this pedophile luckily he got kicked out of our town, and you think the father and the mother would have learnt their lesson but those 2 children our out on our streets even had tried to steal a cat! so in my point children need a decent up-bringing.
2007-11-05 22:54:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~welshy~ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The carrying of weapons is not the problem. Just remember the poor guy dragged through the courts for having a Swiss Army knife in a brief case in the boot / trunk of his car!
Or the people arrested in England for having drugs in their house (which had been let for a number of years and they did not live there). The English police are target driven and are not to be trusted.
The problem is the use of weapons in committing serious crimes.
People used to hang for taking guns and murdering people. Life should mean life somewhere like Guantanamo. The ´murderer's property should be forfeit and sold for charity..
2007-11-06 01:37:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
A heavy prison sentence if a weapon is used or the victim is threatened with one> The Criminal must realise that he is likely to leave prison as an aged person. Murder must mean life without remission. Hard and souless labour to be the norrn except for very good behaviour
2007-11-06 03:43:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Scouse 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would start off by flooding the most dangerous and high impact areas with cops. One neighborhood at a time. Instead of using 3000 cops, I would use 7000 cops. 1st I'll get me together a good narcotics team of officers to raid every drug spot in the neighborhood. I would have them raid the same drug spot/location every other day for a week till we are sure they are not considering to reopen up shop. Mean while I'll have cops pull over and or stop anyone that is walking towards the drug spot and have them search. Then I'll get me a squad of officer to buy guns off of criminals this way we can gather evidence as to where these guns are coming from. Then I will have a different team arresting prostitutes and their johns. I would make it clear that if your a parent and I catch you using drugs I would have the city and or state take your children away from you.
2007-11-06 00:29:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by John 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
simple. prison should BE!! prison. up at six in the morning. work till six at night. for every day you refuse to work, that day gets added to your sentance. you can iether stay here for the rest of your life! or knuckle down and do your time. armed robbery of any! kind. no one hurt. 10 years hard labour. if some one dies. 20 years hard labour. dont matter who pulled the trigger, you all serve exactly the same sentence. no one fears prison any more. thats why we are fast becoming a lawless country. the legal system simply protects its money generating customer. THE CRIMINAL. it has to stop.
2007-11-06 02:35:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If I knew the answer to that, I'd be sitting in a much bigger house secure in the knowledge that I was the only person in the world with the answer.
No one on here knows, mate. There's just lots of different people with opinions.
2007-11-06 12:11:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Beastie 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
human beings have faith that the "Police" are in charge for clearing up the crimes you have defined. in actuality Police in trouble-free terms enforce law dreamt up by way of politicians and their advisors. What one has to keep in mind is that neither of those communities of human beings are Police or have been uncovered to the fear of drug or gun crime. as a effect of this they have wishy washy law that doesn't enable Police to enforce the guideline of regulation. we would desire to continuously keep in mind that Police are a tension, no longer a service and as such would desire to settle for sturdy law to paintings with. the creation of Human Rights in this u . s . a . has been the main unwell concept out and maximum rushed by way of piece of poo that i've got ever seen. Human rights are necessary in any present day society yet we would desire to stability them with the better sturdy. to make certain that Police to uphold a suspects human rights they actual could push aside everybody else's in that community. for example, a general drug broking in Police custody has in trouble-free terms a undeniable time wherein to be interviewed previously the two being released or charged. in the event that they sit down there and say no longer something that's in all probability they're going to could be released. it isn't the fault of the Police, it is the fault of the idiots that make the regulations. apart from no longer sufficient is being accomplished to `enable witnesses to return forward to Police. Their anonimity could be paramount to allow them to grant information without concern. it is not being accomplished. we opt for a central authority which will actual handle crime in all guises firmly and permit the Police to convey human beings to courtroom. The courtroom must be allowed to impose a applicable sentence on the criminal in the event that they are got here upon in charge and not be inspired by way of the inhabitants in prisons. they are there for a reason. reformatory could be an academic equipment the place the carrot and stick technique is utilized rigidly. help for Police and reformatory team and the familiar public to call for applicable law is the only replaced into to treatment this social unwell.
2016-11-10 10:38:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by philbeck 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lock the offenders up for a minimum of 10 years and let everyone know the minimum sentence will be 10 years for carrying weapons, that will soon cut it down.
2007-11-05 23:12:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Longer jail sentences given by capable judges, not senile fools as now.
2007-11-06 06:50:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Much longer sentences and prisons should be for punishment, not holiday camps as they are at present.
2007-11-06 08:41:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by flint 7
·
0⤊
0⤋