See the 18th panel. Atheists you better repent NOW !!
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/5001/5001_01.asp
2007-11-05 16:10:48 · 16 answers · asked by going postal 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Dan C there are no sources more credible than Chick Publishing. Everybody knows that.
2007-11-05 16:18:31 · update #1
Yes it is proof that early man kept dinosaurs as pets... these footprints show a man taking his pet T-rex out for his morning walk...
2007-11-05 16:14:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Quote:
Are the footprints found in Glen Rose TX proof that man and the dinosaurs inhabited the earth together?
No. It is actually proof that nature eventually recycles everything, including the genetic sequences which cause the creature's footprints to look very vaguely like primate or human ones.
2007-11-05 16:56:12 · answer #2 · answered by chris g 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're kidding, right?
You're going to believe that a Christian tract, a cartoon at that, is a better scientific text than all those books used in high schools, universities, and laboratories all over the world?
If I repent of anything, it will be of wasting my time clicking on the link you provided.
ADDED: After reading your additional comments, I'm guessing that you really are kidding. The writers and editors at Chick Publishing think they're smart, and believe it or not, they're serious! But to thinking, educated people Chick Publishing is a joke.
2007-11-05 16:20:41 · answer #3 · answered by Don P 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"The Paluxy River ‘guy prints’ could resemble human footprints superficially, yet they lack the anatomy of exact human footprints. besides, dinosaurs and people are of very diverse length and weight, yet interior the Paluxy River, tracks made via the two dinosaurs and meant people are sunk to the comparable intensity interior the rock, meaning that the two types have been made via creatures of the comparable generic weight. interior the comparable way, the distances between footfalls are spaced the comparable distance aside, showing that they've been made via creatures with comparable stride lengths."
2016-10-15 04:59:02 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
" . . .initial critical work in the early 1970's (Neufeld, 1975), and more intensive scientific studies in recent years, have convincingly refuted the "man track" claims, and led to their abandonment even by most creationists. The alleged human tracks involve a variety of phenomena, including elongate dinosaur tracks, erosional features, indistinct markings of unknown origin, and a few carvings."
Seriously, if you're making claims, at least make them credible.
2007-11-05 16:16:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. It is a famous fraud. The "archaeologist" who "excavated" this site was a fundie who "cleaned up" the footprints to make them look human. You can follow them beyond the origional "excavation" and see that these footprints have 3 toes with claws. Guess the link's photographer didn't take pics of what he/she didn't want to see.
2007-11-05 16:14:03 · answer #6 · answered by sudonym x 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No the footprints inside the dinosaur print doesn't even look like a human print.
2007-11-05 16:14:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Probably not.
However I am convinced that certain dinosaur footprints found along the Paluxy River are not millions of years old, as evolutionists claim, but merely thousands of years old, as I have personally found pieces of charred wood in the same strata as footprints of a 3-toed dinosaur still lying along the river bed.
2007-11-05 16:22:49 · answer #8 · answered by wefmeister 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Use your head. Do you really think man would stand a chance against T Rex? Proof? What are you thinking?
2007-11-05 16:14:25 · answer #9 · answered by Tricia R 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The "human footprints" were carved into the rock. It has been proven.
2007-11-05 16:14:50 · answer #10 · answered by October 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋