Separation of Church and State?

Question

Personally, I think that there SHOULD be a separation. The religion of the majority is not the religion of all... so I belive that in a democracy, at least, there should be a reasonable separation between the two. Ethics are not the same as heaven-sent laws.

But I'd love to hear other people's perspectives-- send 'em in!

Answer 1

the laws and constitution should be read in a way that protects the individuals right to practice their religeon freely and without restriction ... it wasnt meant to protect the state or anyone else from the religeous ...

Answer 2

Yes there should be a reasonable separation, but that would also include the government not interfering in religious holidays or from some people trying to stop other people from saying Merry Christmas. Every person has a right to believe the way they want to, and that is the only way that the government was suppose to have any say in. To make that a constitutional right. Allow people to have their Merry Christmas, or their happy Hanuka or what ever they believe in. It is their right.

Answer 3

I think everyone believes in separation of church and state. The question is what that means and how it is practiced. The etymology of the term and its prior use is very different from what it means in popular culture today. For the most part, even in Jefferson's writings, it was to protect the free practice of religion from government intervention, especially with taxation. This was the issue addressed in Jefferson's letter to the Virginia Baptists which is the first use of the phrase. Today, most people think of it as withholding religious views from government office or invoking them in legal matters.

Answer 4

The ***PRAYNOGRAPHER*** will talk to this question, by means of fact his wisdumb is All understanding. you would be smart to hearken to his words of wisdumb.chatting with the exchange to the form with regard to faith, and government. It reads like this. the government shall not admire the corporate of any faith, or block the corporate of any faith. For you toddlers of god that don't understand what the be conscious admire potential please look it up.lots of you may't study ,or comprehend what you study. I The ***PRAYNOGRAPHER***will clarify it to you. admire: to tutor, or carry in severe regard for one element over yet another Now do you think of you may decide what meaning. while it comprises religions the government. ought to stay independent. In different words stay out of the business company of marketing , or demoting any faith,be break away,not motivate one over the different. Do the user-friendly xristian minds in this panel get it. The***PRAYNOGRAPHER***thinks the term would desire to declare "The separation of church and strategies.i think of it may be risk-free to declare that xristians, a minimum of countless those I actual have known , have not got a working strategies.they must be led around like a puppy on a leash. church homes do not pay their truthful share in taxes,or do not pay any . Then they ought to stay out of a central authority they don't help. The ***PRAYNOGRAPHER***has spoken. Now bypass away and be born returned till now I spank you!!!!

Answer 5

im a very religious person, but seeing the way people live in saudi arabia or iran proves separation of church and state is the only reasonable option.
for example, didnt it really piss you off when bush vetoed the stem cell research because "his beliefs"

Answer 6

I think it's in the best interest of ALL Americans, religious or not to keep a firm separation between the two.

Answer 7

I strongly believe in secular government (separation of church and state), but I also think that people are free to vote according to their religious principles. So if someone opposes homosexuality because of their religious beliefs, I think they are free to vote according to their beliefs.... but the law itself must be secular. The law is established according to the people, not according to religious books.

Answer 8

I agree. I once saw an answer a while back that said "Christians are majority and majority rules" as their justification to impose their silly dogmas on everyone. Yeesh.

Answer 9

There should be absolute separation between church/state.

Answer 10

I agree.
Now try separating church and state in Saudi Arabia.

Answer 11

Well there is a separation although many christians in America are trying to knock it down. But don't let them. You don't need religion to be ethical!