Does Kirk Cameron's Banana Argument mean...?

Question

that God doesn't want us to eat pineapples or cows or anything else much more difficult to prepare for consumption?

I mean look at a cow, it doesn't fit in your hand. There's no color coded scheme to know when to peel open a cow. In fact, there isn't even a tab to peel open the cow.

Should we only be eating bananas, apples and other easy to consume foods?

Answer 1

Kirk can use the banana argument to argue for why god created us for oral sex-

Fits well in the hand and mouth
has a handle underneath
The tip creates perfect suction
smooth retractable skin
Points upwards for easy access
hairs are curly so you dont poke your eye

Answer 2

No silly. A cow selects the right grasses to eat for you. You might say they are cowizards. Then he cycles them through his four stomachs,regurgitating them and chewing them again. That would be like the recycle bin. He deletes the bad stuff in the field and saves the good programs for your dinner table. (milk.com)(beef.org) The enzymes in pineapple help digest your food. That is why it is usually served with ham.

Answer 3

It was Ray Comfort's hypothesis, which he abandoned a few years ago when it was demonstrated to him that the wild banana is not the same as the one he was using. In the video where Comfort demonstrates the utility of domesticated bananas, Cameron appears to be dumbstruck. Of course, that could just be his natural state.

I imagine the C&C BS factory was pretty embarrassed to have to admit that humans did a better job than God when it came to foodstuff.

Answer 4

Have you watched the video?

That guy is GOOD! But notice that even Kirk cracks up at watching him...

He's the sort of huckster you'd see at the fair selling something - he'd have you talked out of five bucks before you knew what hit you, and all the holes in his argument would only occur to you as you walked away because his presentation was, well, GOOD!

But therein lies the trick of that argument - it's all presentation and no content.

Once you start to think it through, as you're walking away if you will, all the holes in it occur to you.

But it is fun to watch...

Answer 5

I don't even get his argument. How does a natural banana look like intelligent design? Wild bananas are proof that a designer was pretty retarded.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Inside_a_wild-type_banana.jpg

Edit: I think cvo doesn't get the point. All those things were selectively breed to fit with us. In nature, they don't come out right.

Answer 6

Of course there's a tab to peel a cow. What do you think the horns are for?

Answer 7

Somehow you miss the point.

Horses are sized just right so we can ride them. We milk cows and they are sized right too for our milking them. A pineapple is not meant to eat like the apple that fits in your hand, that's why it is sized differently. Trees are just tall enough to shade us. I could go on but you still may not get it. Everything in this life seems to be made for just for us.

After all, I would agree with the cow thing if cows were 20 feet tall.

Answer 8

Considering Ray Comfort's comment about bananas being "Streamlined and designed to fit perfectly in the human mouth" it often makes me wonder about "other things" that are streamlined and could fit in our mouths much in the same way...

I know Ted Haggard figured that one out REAL quick.

I'm lovin' it.

Answer 9

As for K.C., "a mind is a terrible thing to waste."

....and that's all I have to say about that.

Answer 10

Vegans think so.

And evolutionists teach us that our teeth are for vegetables, not meat.

Don't believe it? Look in your doggie's mouth and look at the way his teeth are. Then look at your own teeth. They are not made for ripping meat.