Evidence for creation outside of biology?

Question

i´m sick of hearing about evolution and that, so leave it out. What evidence is there on earth, and in the solar system for creation?
you will notice i havnt asked for evidence against creation, so dnt waste your time with generic - there is none blah blah blah - im willing to listen to your opinions, just not here thanks

My science! is the whole yahoo community thick as sh1t?
when did i say i didnt believe evolution?
if i wanted to know about those issues, i would ask a different question. Sometimes its interesting to know how other people think, even if you don´t agree with them. you bunch of clowns

obviously im not speaking to every1 here but some; do any of you think you might change the world by writting "there is no God" on yahoo answers? you think if u write it enough ppl will believe you?

snow leopard, if you have so much evidence for creation, may you please tell me some in answer to my question.
thanks

Answer 1

There is proof all around, the most visible is our sun and moon. From our view they appear to be the same size even though one is much bigger and farther away. Yes it is an optical illusion but a beautiful example of GOD's majesty. But the atheist will say its just a coincidence, but then the big bang and evolution theories relies mainly on coincidence. Praise the LORD.

Answer 2

Do you mean "Creation" or "special creation?"

For the former, there is one incontrovertible in-your-face fact: stuff exists. Given the alternative, that that which exists could be nonexistent, existence strongly suggests that that which exists has been at some past time been created (whether it was created by a "someone" is another matter.)

On the other hand, if you mean "special creation" of the literal-Genesis happened-six-thousand year ago variety, no there is actually no cosmological evidence to support such an event. None at all. In fact, a 6000 year old "special creation" can be ruled out by lead isotope dating, which shows that the solar system is in fact 4.55 billion years old.

Answer 3

As creationism is no branch of science (no falsifiable hypotheses - which is the definition of science) but a question of belief, asking for "evidence" is going into the wrong direction. Either you believe or you don´t, as with basically all religious topics.

There can be no "evidence" for creationism, as has been rightly pointed out. There is evidence against it, but you clearly stated you don´t want to hear it, so I´ll leave it at that. :)

Answer 4

Just look in the bible. It was written a few thousand years ago. Evolution was made up a few decades ago. And on and island where the man could have been going crazy. Scientists have proven that the earth is about 6 thousand years old-not enough for things to evolve out of nothing. If the earth was a degree closer to the sun we would all die. There are so many gaps in the theory of evolution. I have so much proof that creation is the way that the earth came to be.

Answer 5

If organic molecules from the "murky soup" of the seas did get into clay...and there is zinc and some other mineral that mysteriously organised exactly the molecules needed to form life...and the crystals in the clay sort of taught these proto-organisms to absorb energy and replicate...that's biology. But that could also be God's way of creating. The order of life forms as they appear in Genesis conforms exactly with scientific findings. Birds came before the taninim or dinosaurs, the Bible says. The fossil of archeopteryx found in Germany proves that this is so.

Answer 6

There is none, other than the fact that scientist can't figure out why a bodie's cellular structure is so perfect.

But you might consider that evolution and even the Big Bang might be reality, even if there is a God (I am Christian by the way). Just because someone says that God created the universe and everything in it doesn't mean that he didn't use evolution or physics.

Answer 7

What evidence do u want for creation.
Except the fact that creation exists!
The energy and matter are inter-convertible(the nuclear bombs).
The natures laws determine the fission and fusion of electrons, neutrons etc.
That is the Laws; the will, the matter and the substance of creation.
So, What is the Q?

Answer 8

If you ask for evidence, then you need to be objective and review what the evidence is *then* decide what it supports, just like in a investigation you don't declare the person guilty and rule out evidence that contradicts that.

Essentially, there is no evidence that supports anything but natural causes for life on this planet.

Answer 9

Give me evidence of God outside the Bible!

The whole point of evolution is based on science the way creation is based on the Bible.

So your question makes no sense.

Answer 10

I have to agree with S31. There appears to be no evidence acceptable to general scientific methods of proof that support creation. I'm sure you will get any number of metaphysical or spiritual answers, but clear and objective physical proof? Nope.