Great question!
I personally have gotten down to three breaths per hour for Goddess Gaia. It's admittedly tougher to jog, but I believe she appreciates my efforts.
2007-11-05 05:12:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. All you would do is save up 1 minute of CO2 and exhale it all at once. Anyway, people emissions do not contribute to global warming because that CO2 came from the air originally when the plants grew that the person ate. It is only CO2 from coal and oil that contributes to global warming, because that carbon has been locked up under ground for millions of years.
2007-11-05 05:37:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
hahaha.... very nice logic. But our human body will make up that 1 min after you start breathing again. Their are many ways to reduce greenhouse effect and i do car pooling.. at least some contribution from my side.
2007-11-05 04:35:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, your body function is the same. Holding your breath only postpones the emission of CO2
2007-11-05 04:28:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by JimZ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'd rather fix my engine to reduce gas emissions... rather than holding my breathe for 1 min each day... its ridiculous
2007-11-05 12:54:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by JeiPril 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have an idea, why don't you hold your breath for all of us if you believe that will work. Hold it for a minute for each person on earth.
2007-11-05 04:39:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by enicolls25 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Technically it would, but by an insignificant amount. It would be much more effective to cut down on pollution
2007-11-05 04:26:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Moo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it'd be better if many held their breath, permanently.
2007-11-06 01:57:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by booboo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
why stop breath for one min each day better stop for ever take pinch of sodium cynide.
2007-11-05 05:37:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah you do that
2007-11-05 07:11:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by ecofriendlygirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋