2007-11-05 04:09:44 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Deke! =0)
2007-11-05 04:13:33 · update #1
if they do - what will that leave us with?
2007-11-05 04:15:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
It would do no good. People of conviction can sometime appear like they are ranting incoherently. But if a person was doing exactly that, I am sure in most cases, they would not place themselves in that category. Yahoo would have a lot of trouble policing the proper category placement, since a lot of religious beliefs can seem incoherent to non-believers. I am a nontraditionalist, and I might come out as being too off the wall, to a narrow minded traditionalist as well as a ranter.
2007-11-05 04:21:25 · answer #2 · answered by astrogoodwin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was starting to think that's what R&S was supposed to be. They'd need to devide the new subsection into: Racist Rants, Grammatically Challenged Rants, Misogynistic Rants, I'm a Better Christian then You Are Rants, and You're All Going to Hell Rants!
2007-11-05 04:19:03 · answer #3 · answered by bainaashanti 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I personally opt for the time period ADOPTEE. I've by no means proposal twice about it. The term "adopted person" simply sounds.... Well... Kinda bizarre to me. All people has their possess private views as to why they want to be referred to as both or and regardless of the way you say it, anyone in the market will be offended one way or yet another. Adoption and probably the most subjects that go together with it are definitely, VERY, VERY tender subjects. However while, some are, I believe, somewhat hypersensitive in the case of this area. I guess maybe as a result of their existence experiences. I don't think that either label is less validating, one is simply more direct and to the point.
2016-08-06 02:32:00 · answer #4 · answered by barra 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Religion (& Spiritually Angry, Incoherent Rants).
.
2007-11-05 04:14:40 · answer #5 · answered by Brandon's been a dirty Hore 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
The problem is that the people who write those angry, incoherent rants are too incoherent to know that they are angry and incoherent.
2007-11-05 11:01:50 · answer #6 · answered by batgirl2good 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There have been too many and that's just the first few hours of the day! If someone wants to pray, pray for an end to the ranting. Or message each other about it if you want to rant but for heaven's sake shut UP! Had to get that out of my system.
I don't don't care what Yahoo does but they shouldn't even let that stuff get posted.
2007-11-05 04:17:20 · answer #7 · answered by Yogini 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
i in my opinion want the term ADOPTEE. I quite have under no circumstances concept two times approximately it. The term "observed guy or woman" merely sounds.... nicely... kinda strange to me. all human beings has their very very own very own perspectives as to why they like to be referred to as the two or and no count number the way you assert it, somebody available will be indignant one way or yet another. Adoption and different of the topics that bypass alongside with it are no longer any doubt, VERY, VERY gentle subjects. yet on the comparable time, some are, i've got self assurance, a sprint hypersensitive whilst it is composed of this project. i think in step with hazard simply by their existence stories. i don't experience that the two label is far less validating, one is merely greater direct and to the factor.
2016-10-03 09:50:17 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they did their servers would overload just from my rants alone! LOL Seriously, some people have to "download" somewhere sometimes, so I guess that might not be a bad idea!
_()_
2007-11-05 04:19:07 · answer #9 · answered by vinslave 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I like my angry incoherent rants mixed in with my stupid out of context questions.
2007-11-05 04:12:44 · answer #10 · answered by CRtwenty 5 · 11⤊ 0⤋
Nah, Laissez Fair works just fine!
2007-11-05 04:21:10 · answer #11 · answered by ajm48786 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋