Older parents are better care taker of the children born to them?

Question

The present days parents have lot of problems in their life, and they are unable to concentrate on their children properly. But whereas the older parents are much better and they look after their children more effectively than young parents. If it is true , at what age do you prefer to have your children and what are all other qualities you expect to have children

Answer 1

My parents were older...43 and 45..when I was born. My older siblings were aged 13-26. While I enjoyed many things the older kids didn't..more time with my parents, a more secure financial enviroment, more privacy...there were some down sides. My parents were less involved in certain aspects of my life than they were when the others were younger...school groups, hobbies, sports. Some of that had to do with the work schedule my father had at the time, but some had to do with my parents simply not having the energy or interest as they did with the other kids. And while my parents did both smoke, they were basically healthy, yet I lost both of them before I turned 21. Both deaths were sudden and completely without warning, no cancers or known heart disease, illness or accidents.

I had my two children in my mid-twenties. I had always felt that I would be as involved and even more prepared if I had a child later in life as my mother did. When I was unexpectedly pregnant at 37, I was floored by how much tougher it was! I have several friends who are just starting families and while they are thrilled, they are finding it tough to adjust to some of the changes such as not being able to just take off at a moment's notice.

I think it is a hugely personal choice. Older parents can offer many things someone in their 20's may not be able to, but the reverse is true as well. I know I made a very conscious choice to have my children before the age of 30 (the unexplained pregnancy mentioned above did end in a miscarriage) because of how the loss of my parents at such a young age affected me. I do take issue with how the media presents pregnancy in women over 40...it is not nearly as easy as many actresses would present and there is a much higher risk of complications, both in concieving and carrying to term. However, if someone has done the research, knows the risks and feels that they are ready to be a parent, than I see no reason why they shouldn't. The only time I feel it is wrong is if they are using fertility treatments to concieve after a woman has naturally entered menopause.

Answer 2

I think it's better to have kids when you're younger. I see so many older parents who are just thrown for a loop when their new baby arrives. They've gone for so much of their lives only having to think about themselves. So when this little one arrives and demands 101% of their attention, they end up feeling totaly swamped. If you're younger, you can deal with the lack of sleep, you're more used to going with the flow of things, PLUS it's so much easier to bounce back (physically) after giving birth. I think that age has nothing to do with looking after your children better or worse. I'm a young parent and I know I take better care of my son then a lot of older parents take care of their children. I'm going to make sure that my son grows up knowing how to be curtious, sharing, kind, friendly...not like the so many rude and abnoxious kids there are these days (most likely raised by older parents). ANother benifit to being a younger parent is you're more able to relate to your children. Also, you won't end up being 50 or 60 or even 70 by the time they leave home. Why wouldn't someone want to be 40 or maybe even a bit younger? That way you can look forward to a long life with your children, your grandchildren and even the ability to meet your great-grandchildren and possibly(health willing) your great-great-grandchildren. Who wouldn't want that?

Answer 3

I had one son when I was 19...we kind of had to grow up together...he watched his father and I go through our party days...drugs/alcohol etc. but we were always good parents....did not neglect him or anything like that, but we didn't give him 100 percent of our time cuz we were still wanting to do our own thing too...I feel......whereas, I had another son 13 years later...and I was done with all the partying etc. and gave him 100 percent of my attention pretty much..we had settled down alot by the time we were 30...
so I can see the difference in the maturity level for sure...19 year olds heads are definetly in a different place than a 30 year old... hope this helps

Answer 4

not always true. Some young people are excellent parents and have WAY more energy with youth to chase and play tag and get more on the kids level. Sometimes older parents have lived their youth and are catious and instead of letting the child experiment with self expression and new experiences (which is what childhood is all about), they try to constantly 'protect' their children because they are in the more cautious, practical stage of life.

It goes both way. Both have pros and cons. there is no right or wrong way or age

Answer 5

Ive seen parents of all ages screw their kids up. Age has nothing to do with it. Its about the maturity of the parent and their commitment to the child.

Iam 24 with a 9 month old, but I know I was ready as a new adult.

Answer 6

Age has nothing to do with it at all! There are wonderful younger parents and wonderful older parents. There are also horrible ones in both categories.

Answer 7

Our first census grew to become into in 1790 and till now 1850 in common terms heads of kin have been indexed. you have some super solutions. I think of census takers had issues as they tried to hold those super massive books with them on horseback. I understand some wrote down the practise on a pad and then entered it on the census varieties whilst they have been given homestead. they had no earthly concept that folk one hundred-a hundred and fifty years later human beings could be pouring over those censuses attempting to come across their kin historic past. they had to get a head courtroom and particular information required for that distinctive census year. that's solid to have the potential to come across different documentation to back up the census practise despite if that's attainable. I quite have discovered blunders i will style of understand. working example considered one of my grandfathers grew to become into 3 years old interior the 1880 census. It shows he has a brother named Emanuel who grew to become right into one million year old. I under no circumstances heard of an Emanuel and found out his sister, Emma, wasn't indexed. i will see how a drained census taker on horseback interior the warm June warmth of Texas could make a mistake. despite if he observed Emma, they positioned dresses on little boys till they have been potty knowledgeable up till the early Fifties. somebody mentioned the ladies have been frillier. nicely around the homestead Emma grew to become into probable donning considered one of my grandfather's hand-me-downs. Then on the 1920 census it shows my father as 14 and he grew to become into quite 6 days in need of his thirteenth birthday. i understand how my grandmother talked. She could be asserting he's 13; he has a birthday 6 days from now. The census taker took it to intend he had already had his thirteenth birthday and he could be 14. She does no longer say, you just to boot say he's 13 as maximum persons could. on the 1880 census my maternal grandmother grew to become into traveling her grandparents and she or he's indexed as their niece. nicely they lived precise next to their son and his new bride and that i've got a feeling they gave the practise and whilst the census taker asked my grandmother's relationship, they concept he meant to them to no longer her grandparents. are you able to think of the confusion that grew to become into brought about whilst greater suitable than one guy or woman wanted to place their 2 cents nicely worth in. How approximately whilst a census taker walked alongside with the farmer as he grew to become into plowing along with his pad against the mule's romp.