Supposedly this book interprets the book of Revelation accuractely. What do you all think of it? Haven't read it - what does it say?
2007-11-05 03:16:23 · 6 answers · asked by Frontier123 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes, I have.
I believe the author really did talk to John and find out what all of Revelation means. There can be NO OTHER explanation. EVERY SINGLE VERSE of every chapter is explained in plainness. The symbols unfolded right before my eyes and my brain, and made so much sense I wondered why no one else could have figured some of the "mysteries" before.
A person only needs to read it for themselves in order to find out. Once you know the truth, you will no longer fear 666, the devil, hell or the likes. The truth will set you free.
It is a long book, and takes some time to get through--at least it did me. I had to read some parts over several times. For a person who is not really interested in religion and the Bible, the first nine sections explain all of Revelation concisely. For those who care (like I did) about what it all means, Section 10 uncovers the truth about the book of Revelation in the Bible, explaining it all.
What does it say? That would take a whole book to explain it!
As for the author not revealing his whole name, I can see why it would be for his protection. Once the leaders of the nations and religions find out that they are the "locusts" John mentions, they won't like "Christopher" very much.
Read it for yourself--and you will see.
2007-11-06 18:27:13 · answer #1 · answered by smallone 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I haven't read it either but the author doesn't stand by the work enough to put their name on it. The major jist seems to be corporate capitalism is evil.
FWIW the author claims to have received the explanation of Revelation directly from St. John himself.
2007-11-05 11:36:37 · answer #2 · answered by urallnutballs 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How would you know that it is accurate? In order to make this claim you would have to have solid evidence that Revelations is true or accurate, and that the book was accurate in its interpretation. I'd say that the best evidence for Revelations is conjecture, therefor this book is making a false claim just to ramp up sales.
2007-11-05 11:21:46 · answer #3 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I read a book several years ago by Salem Kirban titled, "666".
It is out of print.
http://www.armageddonbooks.com/kirban.html
Pastor Art
2007-11-05 11:20:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The title alone proves its contents are unscriptural. I'd stay away from it if I were you.
2007-11-05 11:19:26 · answer #5 · answered by Suzanne: YPA 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It answers all your question on whether God exist OR not!
2007-11-05 11:23:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋