The King James Bible (l6ll)---The confusion resulting from the use of several different English translations at the same time led finally in 1611 to the publishing of the King James Bible to replace all of them.
When James became king in 1603, he convened a meeting of Anglican bishops and Puritan clergy to settle differences among them over the various translations. When it was suggested a new translation be made from the Greek and
Hebrew with marginal notes restricted to matters of language and parallel passages, the king approved it.
King James appointed 54 scholars to do the work, with 47 of them actually participating. They were divided into six groups to work on different portions of the Bible. Each group's completed work was reviewed by a committee of 12,consisting of two men from each of the six groups. Final differences were settled by a general meeting.
The Authorized (King James) Version of 1611 was technically a revision of the 1602 edition of the Bishops' Bible, which included the Apocrypha. So the first edition of the King James Version included the Apocrypha! In 1615 the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury forbid the binding or selling of Bibles without the Apocrypha on penalty of a year in prison, in response to the opposition of the Puritans to use of the Apocrypha. Nevertheless, copies of the King James Version without the Apocrypha were produced beginning in 1626.
It is worth noting that the British and Foreign Bible Society, formed in Great Britain in 1804, chose to end the practice of distributing editions of the Bible containing the Apocrypha in 1826. When no protests came from the public, other Bible publishers adopted the same practice. For a century and a half now, it has been practically impossible to buy over the counter in any ordinary bookshop in Britain or America a copy of the King James Version containing the Apocrypha.
The King James Bible didn't receive immediate acceptance by church members. It took almost 50 years for it to gain a higher place than the Geneva Bible.
But once it was fully accepted, the King James Bible became the Bible of choice of English-speaking people for the next 300 years. Its beauty of language comes from the period of Shakespeare and Milton, and its heartfelt message breathes from a century when translators had given their lives through fire and sword to deliver the Bible to the people.
The King James translators, like the English Bible translators before them, were not without their theological biases. They were primarily Church of England theologians who had inherited much of their theology and church practices from more than 1500 years of church tradition. For example, since the Church of England practiced infant baptism and sprinkling, the translators followed the decision of earlier English translators to transliterate the Greek word "baptizo" into English as "baptize" rather than translate it correctly as "immerse."
The popularity of the King James Bible put an end to major church efforts to publish English translations, but private individuals continued to produce new translations.
2007-11-04 14:58:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by BrotherMichael 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bible King James edition was named after king James 1st.He agreed to a new edition in 1611 at the 'Hampon court conference' it was produced by about 50 scholars and was for centuries the bible of English speaking countries.King James 1566-1625 was James 6th of Scotland 1567-1625 he became James 1st of England and Ireland as well 1603-1625 on death of Elizabeth 1st.
2007-11-04 15:10:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The christian bible is an edited book made up of some books and not others.the King James edition was badly translated in the reign of king James not by the king.It's the most widely used version in the English speaking world. many of the contradictions were from the bad translation,for example the ten commandants actually reads ten suggestion's . they did the best that they could for the time and era that did the translation
2007-11-04 15:00:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
King James wanted an English version so he had the Bible translated into English.
2007-11-04 14:57:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by .skjceuafrepiuahfpoefhpieuaf 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
King James was the King that ordered the Bible translated into English.
2007-11-04 14:56:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Rock & Roll Doctor 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
King James I of England had it commissioned. He didn't actually do it. A lot of translations of the Bible have been done outside the Holy land.
2007-11-04 14:56:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Purdey EP 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
King James under no circumstances had something to do with it different than to decree (even without analyzing it) that that's a solid e book. He merely listened to the words of his depended on aides. He did no longer write something yet a minimum of it serves an merely approximately non-biased reporting. modifying is regularly accomplished by massive Christian religions by providing it frequently in step with annum as A NEWLY REVISED version. Do you think of and have self assurance that's God like too to be changing words as though God is changing His techniques?
2016-10-03 09:05:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by kerby 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
King James ordered, and paid for, the translation of that version from Greek to English.
2007-11-04 14:56:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by peersignal 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
The 16th century king of England, he had the scriptures translated into English.
The bible has been translated into all the different languages, so people all over the world can read it.
2007-11-04 14:57:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sweet Suzy 777! 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
King James didn't edit the bible, it was transcribed by dozens of highly educated men.
2007-11-04 14:58:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by twincrier 4
·
1⤊
0⤋