2007-11-04 13:59:34 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Neither, he was Middle Eastern/Jewish.
Liesel.
2007-11-04 14:31:17 · answer #1 · answered by Liesel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Catholic Church affirms the Jewish heritage of both Jesus and Christianity, "To the Jews belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ.'
For more information, see the Catechism of the Catholic Church, sections 839 and following: http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt1sect2chpt3art9p3.htm#839
With love in Christ.
2007-11-12 14:31:32 · answer #2 · answered by imacatholic2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The CORRECT Answer is. . . . . D, neither one.
Believe it or not, Jesus was actually descended from Arabic stock, and had reddish-brown hair, as many of the lighter complexioned Arabs do.
2007-11-05 06:47:53 · answer #3 · answered by Grizzly II 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neither. He was Middle Eastern/Jewish. Which means he had dark hair, dark eyes, and dark skin.
2007-11-05 00:21:13 · answer #4 · answered by Bookworm 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
who cares? Jesus is Jesus. hes the best there is, hes our savior. it doesn't matter what he looks like...
2007-11-12 14:44:01 · answer #5 · answered by LICIOUSSSS 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's debated whether he was black or brown, or if he even existed at all.
If he did exist, he certainly was not white.
2007-11-04 23:58:50 · answer #6 · answered by LadySuri 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Does it matter one way or the other? Not to me!
2007-11-05 10:18:49 · answer #7 · answered by absent farmer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Looking at mideasterners I would say brown.....
2007-11-05 02:44:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋