HINT:
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/060405/060405_nsf-fish_hmed_11a.h2.jpg
ANSWER:
It's the missing link between fish and reptile which Creationists claim doesn't exist. It's a 6-foot long fossil found in Canada.
2007-11-04 08:17:12 · 5 answers · asked by I'm an Atheist 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
yes, I've seen the fossil
2007-11-04 09:00:54 · update #1
I'm a Christian Evolutionist.
What's ur point?
2007-11-04 08:22:57 · answer #1 · answered by 1Netzari 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes I do, he's a friend of mine here on Answers.
He got his name from the supposed "missing link" that is anything but. Scientists are simply "begging the question" and they "assume" and "guess" that the fish was evolving, but have absolutely no proof whatsoever. And NO ONE is claiming that is doesn't exist. See the links below from a known Creationist website regarding your little fish.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2007/0117zimmer.asp
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n2/tiktaalik-fishy-fish
2007-11-04 08:22:07 · answer #2 · answered by Last Ent Wife (RCIA) 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Ironically and satirically, have you actually seen this fossil? Lol!
2007-11-04 08:26:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Or, maybe, that is just a distinct species of animal that died out.
2007-11-04 08:27:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
It's a type of painful rash ;)
2007-11-04 08:22:15 · answer #5 · answered by ImUURU? 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋