English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Be specific here. Many people on Y! Answers discredit the Bible on a regular basis.

So, I'm wondering what part of the Bible you have proven to be false?

Please reference the exact Scripture.

Obviously, there are parts of the Bible that must be taken on faith. I'm not talking about these parts. Faith must be used to believe in Evolution, Creation, etc.

If you believe the Bible is just a mix-match of stories, surely there are parts that contradict themselves or have historically been proven to be false or inaccurate. So let's hear it.

2007-11-04 08:14:35 · 15 answers · asked by RedThread 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

15 answers

The claim that the various animals were "created" in their current form, all at once. That is, of course, utterly false.

There are numerous other examples. I'm not to excited about Biblical contradictions - any reasonably long text will contradict itself, though of course it refutes the claim that the Bible is the "unerring word of God". But the Bible's central claims are simply false.

2007-11-04 08:20:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

um ... you're no longer asking lots. hehehe! it may take hours for me to decrease and paste each and every of the flaws interior the Bible yet how approximately i merely furnish some. in Leviticus God checklist the forms of birds that should not be eaten, between them herons, eagles owls and BATS. bats are no longer birds. Lev 11:13-19 in Leviticus God grants a treatment for leprosy that involves the ritual killing of doves Lev 14.2-fifty two. leprosy won't be able to be cured by killing doves despite if nicely rehearsed is the ritual. it took 40 YEARS for the Israelites to holiday from Egypt to Canaan. even back in Moses' day considered one of those journey does no longer have taken greater suitable than 2 weeks. God reasons the solar and the moon to stand nevertheless interior the sky so Joshua can end a conflict. nicely, God could have had to reason the Earth to end spinning simply by fact the solar and the moon do no longer likely holiday around the sky. Josh 10.12-13 Chronicles sixteen:30 "worry till now him, each and every of the earth: the international will additionally be good, that this isn't any longer moved." i'm tremendously effective the Earth spins on an axis and travels around the solar. Jer 8:17 For, behold, i'll deliver serpents, cockatrices, between you, that's definitely no longer charmed, and that they shall chew you, saith the LORD. cockatrices? oooh riiiight. they're present day in comparable habitats as unicorns, dragons and satyrs which additionally are mentioned interior the Bible. nicely, sufficient for now. once you're truly involved you're able to do your individual analyze. playstation . cultural context? wait a minute... do you mean to assert that The word of God, The eternal and Unchanging reality relies upon on analyzing "cultural context"?! you mean ... God did no longer truly mean to assert that bats are birds and the sending of nasty cockatrices grew to become into an empty danger meant in common terms to freak out the ignorant natives?

2016-10-03 08:23:46 · answer #2 · answered by hilderbran 4 · 0 0

I will just presently talk about one (of a few); the index (my present terminology). It does not match scripture. It defines old tetament as Genesis-Malachi. The scriptural old testament was done away when Christ died on the cross. The book of Genesis is not 'old testament'; examples a woman's pain at child birth (Ge. 3), the rainbow (Gen. 9), the multiple languages (Gen.11). The scriptural 'old testament' is the law of Moses (synonym; old testament) 2 Cor. 3:13-14 KJV or NKJV (other English translations tend to use the phrase currently of old covenant.

2007-11-04 08:53:53 · answer #3 · answered by jefferyspringer57@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0 0

That Jesus was God's only son or begotten son, and it was the Bible that lead to my conclusion:

In Psalms 2:7, David (saws) says "I will proclaim the decree of the Lord: He said to me, "You are my Son; today I have become your Father."

Exodus 4:22-23, "Then say to Pharaoh, 'This is what the LORD says: Israel is my firstborn son. And I say unto thee, Let my son go, that he may serve me: and if thou refuse to let him go, behold, I will slay thy son, even thy firstborn. " It is my understanding that Israel was the nickname given to Jacob (saws)?

Psalms 89:27,in reference to David (saws) "I will also appoint him my firstborn, the most exalted of the kings of the earth."

1 Chronicles 22:9-10 says "But you will have a son who will be a man of peace and rest, and I will give him rest from all his enemies on every side. His name will be Solomon, and I will grant Israel peace and quiet during his reign. He is the one who will build a house for my Name. He will be my son, and I will be his father. And I will establish the throne of his kingdom over Israel forever.'"

I inserted the (saws) as per my own religious beliefs, it's not an actual part of the verse.

I know, I will get a lot of thumbs down, but it makes me wonder why people still hold so tight to this belief when their own text proves otherwise.

2007-11-04 08:22:00 · answer #4 · answered by hayaa_bi_taqwa 6 · 1 1

1 Chron 29:7 And gave for the service of the house of God of gold five thousand talents and ten thousand drams, and of silver ten thousand talents, and of brass eighteen thousand talents, and one hundred thousand talents of iron.

King David collects ten thousand drams (or darics) for the construction of the temple in Jerusalem. This is especially interesting since darics were coins named after King Darius I who lived some five hundred years after David.
As usual, the reported amounts of gold, silver, and iron are grossly exaggerated. (100,000 talents of iron, for example, would be about 34 million kilograms.)

2007-11-04 08:22:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The literal creation story has been proved a myth.
I'm sure you don't need me to tell you which parts of the bible that is in.

2007-11-04 08:21:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Jesus was crucified on th cross by the Jews. There are no records of Jesus being crucifed on a cross at that time.

2007-11-04 08:33:16 · answer #7 · answered by Monkey Man 3 · 1 1

Lets all think about this... Love your nieghbor as your self...Honor your mother & Father...Don't Kill...Don't steal...Don't lie... Hmmm...

2007-11-04 08:20:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Talking donkeys and snakes.
Worldwide flood (no evidence of the genocide)
Lot's wife turning into a pillar of salt
The Dead Sea splitting in half
Surviving in a giant fish for three days.

Science has proved all of these wrong.

2007-11-04 08:19:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 9 4

this query as been answered ad nauseum. use the friggin search engine. we're getting weary of doing your research for ya just so you can dismiss the facts.

2007-11-04 08:21:21 · answer #10 · answered by nebtet 6 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers