When a politician plays the religion card when campaigning, are you more or less likely to vote for them?

Question

Or, does it not factor into your decision at all?

Answer 1

Given the exclusive nature of religion itself, I would be far less likely to vote for a politician who espouses the truth of one religion over another. Why?

A politician is an individual who is supposed to represent his/her community. This individual should be sensitive to the needs and desires of all his/her constituents. This simply cannot take place if the religious politician has a bias against members of a differing religion. In short, the politician will only represent those of like religious mind, thus not represent or under-represent those who think and believe differently.

The only time I would support a politician who plays the religious card is if he/she does so with the purpose and intent of including all.

Answer 2

It really turns me off. If the greatest two leaders in the last century had played the religious card I would have dropped my support for them.

David Loyd George, and Winston Churchill. Both had great religious conviction but never played it as a way to Parliament.

Why does it turn me off so much. Because any person who has to use it is desperate or they are going to run the country by a set of rules which do not resolve problems in the modern world.

It is a pity that England is little more than a puppet state of the USA, because we do not have a say in what goes on.

Answer 3

the reason that many politicians "play the religion card" is with the help of the fact maximum individuals of voters enable that to impression their vote casting. If voters did no longer care some politicians non secular ideals than they might not be so rapid to flaunt them. on the subject of the separation of church and state, even with familiar perception that's no longer certainly a binding political theory and is maximum actual no longer interior the form. It replaced right into a fact issued via Thomas Jefferson in a letter written to the Danbury Baptists to guarantee them that the government replaced into no longer likely to declare a state faith as were accomplished in England. What this skill is that the government would not have a suitable to tell you what to believe, no longer that there is to be no faith in politics. Thomas Jefferson replaced right into a professed Deist yet replaced into additionally a supporter of religion and particularly usually suggested it in his affairs which is composed of those concerning government artwork.

Answer 4

Less. I'd rather know exactly where a politician stands, even if it means I disagree with them.

That's why I'm having some serious problems with the upcoming election. The only way I'll vote Republican is if Senator Clinton wins the nomination. I'm tired of all the pandering to the religious "right."

Answer 5

Don't they all play the religious card at one point or another? I am pretty sure they do so their religious preference makes no difference to me. I would be way less likely to vote for them if they dissed ANY religion because that would just show their intolerance to anything different than them.

Answer 6

A star for such a beauty...
No..if any politician uses religion for his vote bank, then I consider him a cheat. he cheats people and the basic principle of serving these very people. No politician should exploit religion and infact they should not be allowed to do so.
The only religion a politician must possess is the religion of humanity and nothing else.

Answer 7

Less. And it appears I'm far from alone in this.

John Tory, leader of the Ontario Conservative Party, recently ran for election against Dalton McGuinty's not-terribly-popular Liberals. Tory blew a golden opportunity to pick up a lot of legislative seats when he proposed giving more tax money to religious schools AND adding creationism to the science curriculum. Americans may be willing to put up with such idiocy but Canadians are not.

Answer 8

It all depends on how they play it.

If its done as "This is the right thing to do, and My God backs me up on it." it comes off a lot better than "My God says this is what the right thing to do is."

technically its the same thing, but by putting the 'rightness' before God, it makes it appear at least as if they would put the country first as well.

However no matter which way they phrase it if I feel that the actions were/are wrong, couching it in faith won't change my mind. especially if evidence at hand tells me the use of 'god' is specifically designed to change my mind

Answer 9

Less likely, they are lying Just like prisoners claim religion to get an early release. If they are soooo sincere, why is the return rate 80% or higher????

Answer 10

In the Vedic religion a Kshatriya(King/Politician) had the duty of protecting his citizens as his own children. I would never vote for anyone who had not studied the Mahabharata.