I wuz (was) told that Politics and Religions are two homosexuals bed fellows, one always like to be on top of the other. When they do come together az (as) won (one) they can be emosionally, psycologically devastating for its subjects but not its over seers. It iz often said that politicians are crooks, can that be said for religious fanatics az well? Often i wonder what would the World would have been if we did not have so many confusing religions, cults, crooked politicians etc. The USA claims to be the model of democracy yet they only have two political major parties. At times i think that the U.K. has the monopoly on God but USA has the franchise on Jesus Christ, no one can sell u Jesus like the TV evangelists in America. What iz ur take on what do they (the six major religions) have in common?
2007-11-04 03:39:51 · 8 answers · asked by Doktorzero 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They are humans.....all to human
They all understand the absolute necessity of morality. And that does not mean hypocrasy. However the Abrahamic traditions have unfortunately been broken from their tradtions of truth. One can understand this by the simple fact that they are murderers. There are about 8,000 animals per second just to enjoy the pleasure of eating their flesh.
2007-11-04 03:43:27 · answer #1 · answered by killah priest 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
heavily... Claiming which you already know something some undertaking and spouting the morsels you have heard, only proves your lack of expertise. that's directed on the guy that reckons the conflict in Bosnia, replaced into approximately race relatively than faith. It replaced into between the (Orthodox church) Romantic Catholics and the customary Islamic sect. i exploit the term "sect" no longer as a showing of disrespect, yet rather, as a showing of my loss of expertise. The Muslim faith has different sides, interior an identical way Christianity does. only like protestants and catholics, there is often in-battling in the Muslim faith. I supply you the conflict between the sunni and shi-ites (forgive any incorrect spellings). additionally, to have human beings asserting that it is the atheists that are the conflict-mongers... talk approximately denial. there is hardly a considerable conflict in historic previous, that wasn't fought to guard the word of somebody's "God".
2016-10-15 00:14:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The diversity breeds tolerance. We may have two parties but it is diverse within the party in self.
2007-11-04 03:43:57 · answer #3 · answered by Bobby K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1.They are all a bunch of indoctrinatees!
2.They are all on a bus of re-legion whish(which) has no brakes!
3.They are all promoterz of segregation!
2007-11-06 12:45:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1.holier than thou members 2. true believers
2007-11-04 03:52:59 · answer #5 · answered by foosieboy1953 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They all partake in Yahoo Answers.
2007-11-04 03:48:18 · answer #6 · answered by Richard F 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All require a lot of belief and little if any facts.
2007-11-04 03:50:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they all believe in god
2007-11-04 03:45:47 · answer #8 · answered by J.A 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋