Are there really ways to cure cancer without medical treatments?

Question

I heard that there is, but the government will not release them due to the fact that they will lose money.

Answer 1

I remember reading a book by Ann Wigmore about how she cured herself of cancer by eating a lot of greens from the garden. She also told in the book about the natural healing she had learned from her grandmother in Eastern Europe, who became an informal healer of soldiers from both sides in WW1. Ann Wigmore is the person who started the wheat grass juice idea.

Answer 2

No there is no miracle cures being 'hidden'. Please remember that there are many countries all over the world . . you would need to believe in a vast conspiracy among all governments and medical communities in every single place on Earth. How many people would this conspiracy involve . . and what happens when new people come into power are they given this secret information too? It's just silly. It's also considered one of the top ten cancer myths. Keep in mind that there are people who are selling books or health products who stand to gain financially by promoting this idea.
There is absolutely no proof or evidence that any government , company, industry, or person is involved in a conspiracy of this magnitude. The press would be all over this if there was even a smidgen of truth.

Discovery: Cancer Myth Number Nine - The Cancer Cure Myth
http://health.discovery.com/centers/cancer/top10myths/myth9.html

Answer 3

What you have heard is absolutely wrong.

Please note that there is no complete cure for CANCER. Only the sufferings can be reduced if the disease is detected in the early stages and treated properly. Further there is always the fear of remission exists. No Government will keep quite it they know the cure when they spend Billions of dollars, why they should keep quite. ? On the other hand they will save a lot of money if the cure is found-

Answer 4

Do I believe that people have been cured of Cancer without mainstream medical treatment? Yes.

Do I believe there is a general cure for it that is being kept from the public? No.

My father has Esophageal cancer and he tried something called lapacho (pau D'arco).
It didn't work. He had an esophagectomy any way and still has cancer.

I beleive there are promising compounds in nature that can help us battle Cancer, but no magic bullet.

Answer 5

Cancer is many different diseases, not just one; no single treatment is effective for all of them so there will never be a single cure for all of them.

There's no conspiracy to hide a cancer cure. Just consider; if there were:

*whoever discovered it would be keeping quiet, even though it would bring them fame and fortune

*every medical professional in the whole world would have agreed to keep the secret. Every single one.

*all of the thousands of people who would have to have been cured by it in order to prove it worked would be keeping quiet about it too

*doctors, scientist, researchers etc would be watching their relatives die and dying themselves (they and their families develop cancer at the same rate as the rest of the population) even though they knew of a cure

And as Judy has sensibly pointed out, governments would save a packet. I know my overworked GP and oncologists would love to be able to send me off with some juice or apricot pits -I'd be out of their hair and the NHS would have saved a packet. But they don't, because they know there's no 'natural' cure that has been tested and proven in clinical trials.


You can get more information about the persistent urban myth that a secret cure exists here:

http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/conspiracy.html

http://health.discovery.com/centers/cancer/top10myths/myth9.html

Some cancers are curable; for those that aren’t existing treatments - chemotherapy and radiotherapy - are not perfect, far from it, but we know, because they have been clinically tested and proven, that they save some lives and extend many others. Cancer treatments are improving all the time thanks to dedicated hard work by those professionals that some people suggest are concealing a cure.

Answer 6

The government makes more money through taxation of the companies that make billions on cancer treatment than they do from the 'ants' that suffer. The money government buddies make is unbelievable. I know, I studied this for years. The financial benefits of human suffering are a lot higher than the losses from medical care. Remember, all those caregivers are taxed, most of the money spent by the government on treatments and such is returned with much more. Those drug companies, raw material suppliers, and more are giving back wayyyy more than is spent. But, not back to taxes, but back to those who spent the money to finance the campaign to get people elected. The 'real' buddy system. Anyone who says otherwise is an idiot.

First, removing environmental toxins and known carcinogens from the shelves of our stores would have a huge impact on reducing cancer rates. Most of the known carcinogens are fossil-fuel and petro based. That would put a huge cut in the pockets of our buddies running the country. So, it will never happen - and people are too stupid and trusting to care.

Second, clean up our food supply to improve the quality of what we consume. We know that fat cells are where the body stores toxins it cannot process. But our agriculture system artficially fattens animals lowering the quality and nutritional value while filling the void with toxins in the artificially inflated fat content. Grains/fruits/vegetables are sprayed with known carcinogens when there are alternatives and most end up on our plates at dinner.

Third, changing the disinfectant process of our public water supplies and delivery system would save countless lives and the pain and suffering that goes along with the diseases increased.

Fouth, fight bacterial infections with natural remedies prior to anti-biotics. Anti-biotics should be available, but dietary and lifestyle changes that increase the ability of the immune system to defeat disease would be a huge improvement in our health care system. It's finally being publicized that those who take a lot of anti-biotics are at a higher risk of developing a number of different cancers.

I believe that there are ways to reduce risks to the point that cancer rates would no longer be an issue. I believe, and have witnessed cancer remission based ONLY on nutritional therapy for a family member. I believe that the European protocols that start with rebuilding the immune system, nutritional therapy, avoidance education, heat therapy, massage and cellular stimulation are proven to work for a lot of cancer patients to at least slow growth and make conventional, medical interventions more successful and long lasting are the ways cancer should be dealt with in this county.

But until we remove the chemicals in our homes that are known to increase risk and exacerbate the symptoms, the current cancer treatment of cut it, nuke it and repeat will continue to suck the financing for natural cures to be studied.

Oh, by the way, aboriginals and other societies that are separate from the conventional grid don't have ANY cancers. They also live to be 120 to 150 years old. My girlfriend in Australia helps these people by bringing them solid goods and textiles and studies these peoples 'medical' therapies through a grant supplied by the University of Adelaide. We could learn a lot from these people...

Here's an example. I have a stuffy nose and a cough. I'll avoid the conventional therapies, go outside and pick some white pine needles, break them up and put them in a pot of hot water to simmer on the stove. My stuffy nose will be gone in 10-15 minutes. I'll grab an organic pineapple from the store, eat it and by morning, most of the mucous will be gone. All better, naturally....Try that once. The basis for nutritional therapy and potential cure for cancer. But not until it can be studied properly.

Answer 7

No.

The government would save millions on Medicare costs, disability costs, widows and orphans benefits etc etc etc if cancer could be cured plus get more income taxes from the extra years of life. I don't understand how someone could think that the government would lose money if cancer patients were cured.