Honestly I would assume he was gay, but you never know..
2007-11-04 04:53:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by sarah w 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
1st off I really hate when lower back tattoos are referred to as a tramp stamp. Thats just a stupid name for it. but if i saw a guy with a lower back tatt as long as it wasnt a fairy or anything like that it wouldnt phase me, men get tattoos everywhere just like women do. So to me its just another tattoo, To each there own. Its there body.
2007-11-04 08:07:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by megleg88 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
allow me placed them this manner for ya: Saw a million: Has a satisfactory tale and so much of it's set in a room! Saw two: In my opinion, it's the quality one, has a satisfactory tale with the satisfactory play of detective metthews and the matters that occur to him Saw three: Is lovely violence, much more than the opposite ones Saw four: please don't take ur children with ur to look it, it has a few screwed traps with BLOOD ALL OVER THE SCREEN!! now, you'll make ur alternative approximately any of them!
2016-09-05 09:59:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by labove 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would think... its just a tattoo.
Doesnt seem weird to me.
It mostly depends on what it is.
If its a flower or a butterfly, then he is gay : ) but if not, then whats wrong with it?
Maybe he was just trying to get on a place where he can cover it.
Not the tattoo artist's fault.
Its just our job.. I mean, what are we supposed to do??
2007-11-04 05:29:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok...so now we stereotype guys because of where they opt to get tatooed. That's like saying because a woman has a tat on her lower back she's automatically a whore ( I have a huge lover back piece that is a mother/child symbol with my son's name and birthdate). I know plenty of guys with back tat, thigh tats, pec tats, and a few with belly rings who are perfectly straight. C'mon guys get real and stop judging people on where they decide to put ink.
2007-11-04 03:47:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Liz A 2
·
5⤊
0⤋
I'm disgusted by how many people have just automatically associated a tattoo with a persons sexuality.
Tattoos have NOTHING to do with a persons sexuality.
STOP GENERALIZING
2007-11-04 05:27:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nanci Raygun 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
i actually know a guy who has the mudflap girls back to back on his lower back, he is covered in tattoos and thought it would be funny. it is in a very gross way because they are hairy.
actually there are quite a few guys that have them.
2007-11-04 03:48:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by somebody's a mom!! 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
If he wasn't homosexual, then I would think he must have gotten very drunk and not have very nice friends. I can't believe a tattoo artist wouldn't talk him out of that.
2007-11-04 02:58:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by slice_n_hook@yahoo.com 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
I would think it was good work, or bad work,
depending on the tattoo........... No judgments.
....................Live and let live..................................
Plenty of guys have them, it doesn't mean any more,
or any less, than what it means to them.
2007-11-04 04:52:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
He may just be an excentric person..
2007-11-04 03:54:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by naomisnews 2
·
0⤊
0⤋