New World order For JW's?

Question

Hi guys, some of you may be aware of the New world order, if not reach into your pockets and see the reverse side of the dollar bill

novo ordo seclorum

It's a world in which was prophesized by daniel, and by John in the book of Revelations

Every person will be given a choice to accept the Mark fo the beast or die

that is to say, thast choice is to become a Luciferian and deny Christ as saviour, after all thats what the devil wanted all along a world in which only he is worshipped. He almost did it during the flood, so god had to wipe out the only person that did not worship him and start again.

Your bible made in the 1950's is the New World Translation

Note the similarity, New World Order, and New World Translation

Newo worlds order will make you Deny Christ, or face the chop, kinda similar to thast other religeon

The New World Translation has every aspect of Christ as a deity removed, in comparison to other bibles

The questrion isa do you notr think thast the New World Translation is just propaganda for the New world order to work on your minds to first deny Jesus as God, as other christians claim?

If not, why is it called the NEw World translation

and why is it the only, bible that you may use

thjere are many bibles

the best being The king james and New international as they do not offer a shortend version of the 10 commandments but

why is that you can only use the New world translation and not any other

and what source of validation did other Jw's use before the 1950's since that was when the New World Translation version was written

The new world order is no joke, look at hre back of your dollaer bill

is it ruled by the antichirst, his eye is at the top of the pyramid

this is what the mark of the beast is about

New world order
New world tranlsation

John 1:1 in the vast majority of Bibles reveal the deity of Christ:(14)

the Word was God (NKJV).

the Word was God (NIV).

the Word was God (KJV).

In contrast, the NWT renders John 1:1 in a most unusual way:

In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.

The footnote, from this verse, in the KIT reads:

“A God.” In Contrast with “the God.”

LINEDANCER:

God create Lucifer the torch bearer as a Cgherub along side Gabriel who was also a cherub

Lucifer stop delivering the otch of praise to God, got jealous and delivered it to himsle, this is what it means to seek enlightenment

he was kicked out of paradise and his name changed from torchbearer to adversary which is satan in hebrew.

God creatred everything good, this is what the Geneis says, Satan created himself, from being good he turned evil, as to why no one knows

I am not bashing JW's. I don't bash catholics

But the intitutions behind them who know more than the followers

There will be a new world order, every country will lose its soverigntiy, and the antichrist will be the ruler of that new world order

this is what is says in Revelations

if not

what do you think Revelations is about?

Keiichi the watchtower society wasn't around in the 1611

they arised with the bavarain illuiminati of wehich Charles Russell is a family member, this is why he is buried in a freemasonic grave

Answer 1

Oh please. We're aloud to use any Bible we want. In my personal library is King James, New International, Jerusalem, Duay (sp) and a couple others I don't remember off the top of my head.
And yes, I am an active Jehovah's Witness

I carry a small King James Bible with my when I go out in my Ministry (along with my New World Translation). I prefer to use the NWT because it is in a modern, understandable language.

We deny Christ is God because he ISN'T. But we give him honor as Jehovah's Son and as our King (as well as our Savior and Mediator).
The Earthly Paradise glorifies the Creator above all else... but that Paradise will be ruled by christ Jesus for 1,000 years.

Most other Bibles have had the "deity" of JEHOVAH God completely removed. How sad his name was replaced with titles only and all because of a silly superstition.

And during the flood, more than Noah alone was saved. Noah's wife, his three sons and the 3 wifes of his 3 sons were also spared... unless you meant to say only one person was disobedient to God during that time and it took an entire flood to destroy the one. Or perhaps you weren't meaning either of those things and I'm taking what you said out of context.
The same can be said of Kennedy's "New World Order" and the "New World" JW's look forward to or our "New World Translation" of the Holy Scriptures.
Just because something sounds similar to something else doesn't mean it has to be connected in any way.
To illustrate further, just because my last name is "Black" doesn't mean I have a dark complexion. Sometimes a word is just a word.

You reading wayyyy too much into things.

As far as Jesus being God- ??? - the scripture you provided, while granted it can be confusing- isn't confusing when you take the Bible as a whole. In so many other places in the Bible we clearly see Jesus is not God.

Answer 2

Many people are not aware that the Watchtower Society printed the King James Version among other bibles. Thus Jehovah's Witnesses use any and all bibles.

Most new bibles from the last hundred years are called "New Translations" because they use older manuscripts to translate from.

New World Order: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ap7aIb9aadfF6XXMoh5CdNvty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071030120119AAvMrTc&show=7#profile-info-C9SMYfT2aa

Pastor Russell's Grave: http://www.freeminds.org/history/pyr_1.jpg

Russell was not a freemason. Neither the symbols found in the Watchtower nor the cross and crown symbol are exclusively masonic. And the cross and crown symbol does not appear on his gravestone in the Rosemont United Cemetery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania — it appears on a memorial erected some years later.

In an address delivered in San Francisco 1913, Russell stated quite clearly that "I have never been a mason." Those who claim Russell was a freemason quote this address out of context without noting the rhetorical imagery.

Answer 3

Whats a Luciferian? FYI, Lucifer is not a name for Satan. The name Lucifer occurs once in the Scriptures and only in some versions of the Bible. For example, the King James Version renders Isaiah 14:12: “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!”

The expression “shining one,” or “Lucifer,” is found in what Isaiah prophetically commanded the Israelites to pronounce as a “proverbial saying against the king of Babylon.” Thus, it is part of a saying primarily directed at the Babylonian dynasty. That the description “shining one” is given to a man and not to a spirit creature is further seen by the statement: “Down to Sheol you will be brought.” Sheol is the common grave of mankind—not a place occupied by Satan the Devil. Moreover, those seeing Lucifer brought into this condition ask: “Is this the man that was agitating the earth?” Clearly, “Lucifer” refers to a human, not to a spirit creature. Isaiah 14:4, 15, 16.

The NWT does not remove the deity of Christ. You and others confuse "deity" with "trinity." The Bible does say Jesus is a god, but he's not Almighty God.

Answer 4

the hot worldwide order may be a fantasy invented via JWs.so that they are #a million and the only a million , who benifit from this. surely they administration each and every subject now( besides the fact that they're quite minority) They administration Media,Banks ,marketplace( any huge subject pondering capability or funds).So surely they administration US plus another international locations in europe. And for this reason will administration UN .surely JWs faith following Mossas"prophet"are so on the brink of"Jesus" principals as the two come from the comparable God.in spite of the indisputable fact that ,modern-day religious prepare via the two is getting removed from unique religions " with the aid of devil consequence ".the two close to or far from faith, sturdy human beings are uique in each and every the place interior the worldwide.i've got faith that there is no religios attitude with out political guidelines. alongside the historic previous and up till now , virtually each and every religious followers battled some how with others . or maybe while no others the only team divide it self and combat interior !!! God bless you all .

Answer 5

all bible says the same Jesus after armageddon will rule the earth during 1000 years and transform this planet in a paradise as Jehovah decided in Genesis 1:27-28. after 1000 years Stan will be released and destroyed eternally an Jesus will give the kingdom to Jehovah.

Give me any bible of no matter what year and what version I can prove you that, the new world under Jesus rulership.

it doesn´t matter what many christians says, many Christians are going to be destroyed by Jesus Christ (Matthew 7:21-23).

JWS don´t deny that Jesus is god, all the sons of God are gods according to Psalms 82:6. and all the angels are sons of God according to Job 1:6 and 2:1.

Jesus is the firstson of God (colossians 1:15-17) so the bible says that Jesus is the frist angel of God almighty and is a god , that is why the bible describe him as a powerful angel in Revelation 10:1-3.

Answer 6

That is the MOST stupid comparison I have ever seen! STUPID.

First of all, JW's have nothing to do with the political scene, so why do you think they support the new world order when it is a man made agenda, not God's Kingdom. Get your facts straight before posting such an ignorant idea.

Second, the Bible used by JW's is NO different than yours. It is in modern english so it's easy to read and understand. I also use 11 translations in my studies and compare them all the time...there is no difference.

Answer 7

You probably have not noticed, but the brothers who write that articles in the Watchtower and Awake! magazines, often use translations from Bibles OTHER than the New World translation..
Also to counter claims that the N.W.T is different from all other Bibles, it is possible to go to BIBLEGATEWAY. com and extract scriptures from various translations and compare them to what the NWT says.
a GOOD EXAMPLE IS THE CONDITION OF THE DEAD AT;

Ecclesiastes 9; 5,6.....Have a look.

Answer 8

Deuteronomy 6:4
Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our God, the LORD is one.

Around 300AD Coptic "and the word was a god"

Harwood, 1768, "and was himself a divine person"

Newcome, 1808, "and the word was a god"

Thompson, 1829, "the Logos was a god

Goodspeed, 1939, "the Word was divine

Torrey, 1947, "the Word was god

New English, 1961, "what God was,the Word was"

Moffatt, 1972, "the Logos was divine

Reijnier Rooleeuw, 1694, "and the Word was a god"

Simple English Bible, "and the Message was Deity"

Hermann Heinfetter, 1863, [A]s a god the Command was"

Abner Kneeland, 1822, "The Word was a God"

Robert Young, 1885, (Concise Commentary) "[A]nd a God (i.e. a Divine Being) was the Word"

Leicester Ambrose, 1879, "And the logos was a god"

Charles A.L. Totten, 1900, "the Word was Deistic [=The Word was Godly]

J.N. Jannaris, 1901, [A]nd was a god"

George William Horner, 1911, [A]nd (a) God was the word"

Ernest Findlay Scott, 1932, "[A]nd the Word was of divine nature"

James L. Tomanec, 1958, [T]he Word was a God"

Maximilian Zerwich S.J./Mary Grosvenor, 1974, "The Word was divine"

Siegfried Schulz, 1975, "And a god (or, of a divine kind) was the Word"

Barclay, 1976, "the nature of the Word was the same as the nature of God"

Schneider, 1978, "and godlike sort was the Logos

Schonfield, 1985, "the Word was divine

Madsen, 1994, "the Word was a divine Being"

Becker, 1979, "ein Gott war das Logos" [a God/god was the Logos/logos]

Stage, 1907, "Das Wort war selbst gttlichen Wesens" [The Word/word was itself a divine Being/being].

Bhmer, 1910, "Es war fest mit Gott verbunden, ja selbst gttlichen Wesens" [It was strongly linked to God, yes itself divine Being/being]

Thimme, 1919, "Gott von Art war das Wort" [God of Kind/kind was the Word/word]

Baumgarten et al, 1920, "Gott (von Art) war der Logos" [God (of Kind/kind) was the Logos/logos]

Holzmann, 1926, "ein Gott war der Gedanke" [a God/god was the Thought/thought]

Rittenlmeyer, 1938, "selbst ein Gott war das Wort" [itself a God/god was the Word/word]

Lyder Brun (Norw. professor of NT theology), 1945, "Ordet var av guddomsart" [the Word was of divine kind]

Pfaefflin, 1949, "war von gttlicher Wucht [was of divine Kind/kind]

Albrecht, 1957, "gttlichen Wesen hatte das Wort" [godlike Being/being had the Word/word]

Smit, 1960, "verdensordet var et guddommelig vesen" [the word of the world was a divine being]

Menge, 1961, "Gott (= gttlichen Wesens) war das
Wort"[God(=godlike Being/being) was the Word/word)

Haenchen, 1980, "Gott (von Art) war der Logos" [God (of Kind/kind) was the Logos/logos]

Die Bibel in heutigem Deutsch, 1982, "r war bei Gott und in allem Gott gleich"[He was with God and in all like God]

Haenchen (tr. By R. Funk), 1984, "divine (of the category divinity)was the Logos"

Schultz, 1987, "ein Gott (oder: Gott von Art) war das Wort" [a God/god (or: God/god of Kind/kind) was the Word/word].

William Temple, Archbishop of York, 1933, "And the Word was divine."

John Crellius, Latin form of German, 1631, "The Word of Speech was a God"

Greek Orthodox /Arabic translation, 1983, "the word was with Allah[God] and the word was a god"

Literature/Drake University, 1943, "And the Word was Divine"

Robert Harvey, D.D., 1931 "and the Logos was divine (a divine being

Answer 9

Here is a free prophesy for the next hundred years:
If the human race is going to in good luck, most of our children will laugh at our primitive beliefs.
If the human race is going to be in bad luck, those few children of us that will remain will all pray 5 times a day, facing Mecca

Answer 10

It is the first work of Biblical Blasphemy that is solely written to support a non christian religion.