English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A friend of mine takes the stuff. I believe the commercial name is Deca Durabolin or just Durabolin. He was telling me how it has no side effects, etc. But what I was wondering what about negative feedback mechanisms from the endocrine system? How does it work?

I've been in the fitness game forever and I've never seen gains like his. I was seriously considering taking it but that little voice in my head is warning me. I won't do anything until I learn more from a pharmacist or health care professional but for the mean time I'd like to hear from experience.

I only want answers from people who have taken it or otherwise know what they are talking about. I'm looking for information about nandrolone and I don't want to be lectured. I can spot a fake and I know when you're talking s**it. Any one who doesn't comply will get thumbed the f**k down.

2007-11-03 15:20:53 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Diet & Fitness

3 answers

as with most gear the side effects are dose dependent. a proper deca cycle can certain be free of any long term sides. deca does suppress HPTA function for most more than test, but proper post cycle therapy can take care of that. 10 weeks of deca at 600 mg consuming 4k calories will pack some serious mass on most depending on their level. deca is a heavy anabolic so technically it should be stacked with test. a properly designed steroid cycle should always be test based.

you will also need some T3 (AAS use decrease TSH), HCG, nolvadex and clomid.

regarding the negative feedback response. basically anytime a foreign substance is detected that acts like a sex hormone the body ceases to produce testosterone. it doesn't matter if it's anavar, dbol, deca, test, tren, etc. they all supress HPTA function. this is what post cycle therapy is for using HCG, nolvadex and clomid to restore endegenous testosterone production. most gains are lost due to improper or not using post cycle therapy.

2007-11-03 15:42:00 · answer #1 · answered by lv_consultant 7 · 2 0

Here's how I understand things. The father of BJJ, Helio Gracie, originally trained in Japanese judo. He experienced difficulties though because the moves of that art often required considerable physical strength, something he did not have in abundance. Through trial and error, he came up with the system that became BJJ. Relative to judo, BJJ emphasizes taking the fight to ground with the idea of gaining superior leverage on your opponent, thereby making sheer physical strength less of a factor than when the opponent is on his feet. To prove that BJJ could be used to submit bigger and stronger opponents, Royce Gracie was chosen instead Rickson Gracie to participate in the first UFC. Rickson being quite buff indeed. And it worked. But now that most contemporary MMAs are in the know when it comes to BJJ, or least how to avoid its traps and submissions, strength definitely matters more than it did when Royce made his early waves. Hence ...

2016-03-13 22:38:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I know about it, 2 people close to me have taken it, but i don't like your nasty tone!

2007-11-03 15:30:50 · answer #3 · answered by °º© r u b y l i g h t s ©º° 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers