There is a lovely corner of South West Saudi Arabia that is sparsely populated
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabuk_Province
Most of the population lives in the one main city while the costal areas along the Red Sea and across from the Sinai Peninsula are virtually uninhabited.
It would be incredibly easy to pick some nice sections of costal land that would be easy for habitation.
Why not move the majority of Palestinians there? They will be closer to Mecca, and it would be only a 10% increase in the population of Saudi Arabia.
I will even make it even better; Israel will pay for the whole thing. It will pay for houses to be built, and the infrastructure to be put in place long before they get their.
Basically they will have a better standard of living then they ever did or could achieve where they live now.
Whom ever has a problem with this idea, go and reflect it back on the other one.
2007-11-03 13:01:09 · 10 answers · asked by Gamla Joe 7 in Travel ➔ Africa & Middle East ➔ Israel
A lot of thumbs up, but no answers, common people just a line or two =P-- star if you like this question as well.
2007-11-03 13:43:27 · update #1
I don't think that idea works, Cheers!
2007-11-03 13:53:22 · answer #1 · answered by HopelessZ00 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Palestinians won't move there. For one they won't be given citizenship, even if there children are born there. It is very difficult for non Saudi natives to gain citizenship, usualy someone wealthy who did something important for Saudi Arabia gets it.
Second if you heard stories from Palestinians about going on Hajj and Umrah, you would know the women are constantly sexually harassed and must wear gloves so the Saudis do not see the white skin on there hands, plus of security grabbing the womens butts while leaving Masjid al haram.
2007-11-03 13:46:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
In his way Stalin was another Hitler, and Stalin lasted longer in power, and died of old age, still in power. Stalin was in charge of Soviet Russia, a very powerful nation. Since that time there have been several dictators in charge of nations which have had wide influence, e.g.Ghaddafi in Libya (small nation by population, but big influence because of oil), Mao Tse Tung in China and Saddam Hussein in Iraq (oil, again, and look at the chaos in Iraq since he was deposed). Nobody can predict the future, but I would not be surprised to find a dictator in a similar position to Hitler at some time.
2016-04-02 03:15:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brilliant solution.
It only goes to show solutions exist, if men of goodwill want peace!
As Hitler attacked country after another weak nation, he always claimed they had foolishly attacked Germany, one by one.
You need a justification for attacking the Jews and "the great satan" who supports them.
Saudi Arabia could have done this aready if they cared.
2007-11-03 14:40:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
On a relative scale, this does seem to be a better solution than the Israel-to-America one.
2007-11-03 21:37:36 · answer #5 · answered by Michael J 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Earlier I posted a similar question but I was just trying to get the Muslims in this forum to understand how we feel when they tell us to 'relocate' Israel! But you seem to have given your plan more thought.....!
2007-11-03 14:04:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
SEND THE PALESTINIANS TO IRAN. we need more gardeners, laborers, peasants and other such manual laborers.
2007-11-03 17:03:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Great idea!!!
2007-11-03 15:16:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
great idea!!! let they be someone else problem!!!
2007-11-04 00:46:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Don't you see they need Israel. Otherwise, how could they continue to play victim.
2007-11-03 13:10:31 · answer #10 · answered by The Voice of Reason 7 · 12⤊ 5⤋