breast cancer treatments?

Question

what are a few breast cancer treatments and their causes/risks?
PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!

Answer 1

Treatment varies from person to person, it depends on what stage of the disease, tumor histology, new diagnosis versus recurrence, tumor marker status, menopausal status, age and the persons overall health and lifestyle. Stage o or DCIS surgery and radiation and hormonal treatment. Stage I, II, IIIA , surgery and lymph node dissection if node positive and radiation and chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Stage IIIB Chemo to shrink the tumor before surgery, Surgery then radiation, post surgical chemo and hormonal treatment or chemo with radiation and hormonal treatment. Stage IV hormonal treatment and chemo or palliative care to reduce breast cancer symptoms. There are all types of side effects from treatment, meds are given for most of the side effects of these drugs. I just depends on the person. If you have cancer which is best the risk of treatment or the risk of doing nothing and dying a lot sooner? Sorry to be so blunt, but that's the facts. I had stage IIIb and still living with the uncertain of when or how long I have. But I'm still here. I may die of something else before cancer gets me. Hope this helps some.

Answer 2

Well, first let me just say for the record I am not a doctor. I'm only telling you from personal experience. I do not have cancer, but my best friend just completed her treatment for breast cancer. First she had a lumpectomy-which was the removal of the actual tumor. Next they removed the lymph nodes closes to the tumor, to eliminate the chances of the cancer spreading there, as well as to test them to see if it had already spread. After that she went for 12 weeks of chemo, followed by 7 weeks of radiation. Each type/stage of cancer has different treatment. But in most cases they will do chemo followed up w/radiation to be sure they got it all. In very RARE cases where they are 100% sure all the cancer has been removed and no stray cells may have split off, they simply remove the tumor and that's that.
Best of Luck and wishes.

Answer 3

You have performed a well activity of supplying know-how - a ways greater than so much questions in this web site - however we cant see the scans or compare what need to be palpable lymphadenopathy and there nonetheless is a first-rate deal of lacking know-how. What used to be the dimensions of the most important breast mass? Can it nonetheless be palpated and measured? CT scans of chest and stomach watching for lung and /or liver involvement? Bone Scan? Serum tumor markers? Serum chemistries. and so forth. Why might you wish to make use of vain, unscientific, unproven homeopathic cures? Some dietary supplements can intrude with the effectiveness of the steeply-priced chemotherapy medicinal drugs she is receiving. Of the 3 distinct combo chemotherapy cures she has had up to now, I just like the Cyclophosphamide, 5FU, and Adriamycin first-rate - however that's simply my option. There are many variants - many chemo medicinal drugs and regimens which have been used comfortably for breast carcinomas. There remains to be Taxol or Herceptin to take a look at. What has been the medical reaction to the 3 cures of chemotherapy already given? Have there been repeat scans or bodily exam proof of reaction? Many of the ones lymph nodes defined at the PET test need to be with ease palpable and measurable. Still such a lot lacking know-how right here. The doses look OK. Why use tamoxifen while the most important carcinoma has poor hormonal receptors? But we will have to no longer be moment guessing the clinical oncologist who has all the know-how and has noticeable this man or woman. You will have to have the choice of a truly moment opinion - no longer an web question - if you're no longer blissful with the care. "IF" that is real "level IV" breast carcinoma, the target isn't a healing. The target is to acquire as so much pleasant survival time as viable. Stage IV metastatic breast carcinoma isn't regarded a curable malignancy - despite the fact that a few sufferers can do good for years. The oncologist will have to have defined this in element. Even despite the fact that ~six months have been wasted on vain homeopathic therapy, this sickness had most likely unfold already again in March while the most important breast mass used to be discovered, so the extend earlier than right clinical therapy has customarily no longer been a change maker right here. We think that almost all breast cancers were developing for years earlier than they're clinically detectable, so you wish to have no longer have too many regrets approximately that five-6 month extend. I might no longer propose any homeopathic dietary supplements whilst you're making an attempt chemotherapy, but it surely might be a well thought to invite your oncologist what he thinks approximately this. We all have our possess critiques. At the college clinical facilities wherein I obtained the thirteen years of coaching to be a board licensed melanoma chemotherapy professional, not one of the professors or attending physicians suggestion tremendously of homeopathic cures.

Answer 4

I have had breast cancer twice first time i had a mastectomy then a reconstruction 3 years later no other treatment .This time i had a mastectomy and reconstruction at the same time plus lymph nodes removed i then had 8months of grueling chemotherapy then three weeks of radiotherapy and i now have to take tamoxifen for five years it wasn't a pleasant experience but i have lived to tell the tale i am now back working full time

Answer 5

Here is the link for you to get a better understanding= http://www.greenerideal.com/lifestyle/0813-treatment-of-breast-cancer-using-radiation-linked-to-increased-chances-of-heart-problems/

Answer 6

i dont know......