English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-03 11:43:30 · 21 answers · asked by Page 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I mean he must have had a hangover on the second day!!! Considering there were no Aspirins availabe at the time, it must have been very tough to perform.
Anyway I think they might have tied him down. ...maybe used handcuffs....!

2007-11-03 11:46:23 · update #1

Just Roving.......

2007-11-03 11:47:01 · update #2

Excuse me!! But I don't the Bible to tell me what he did was wrong.!! I KNOW it was wrong)))

2007-11-03 11:48:56 · update #3

I meant to say I don't need the Bible!!!! lol

2007-11-03 11:50:13 · update #4

Did they take advantage of a helpless, drunk man and performed their duty???
Bad...bad girls! LOL

2007-11-03 11:52:49 · update #5

21 answers

You know, Lot was an impressive man. Because I've found, first-hand, that after a certain level of drunkenness, sex just isn't going to happen. So what impresses me is that Lot was able to get JUST drunk enough so that his teenage daughters were the ones responsible for their own victimization, but NOT TOO drunk; he was still physically up to it, so to speak.

It's a fine line. Frankly, it's one I didn't know existed. That's why the Bible is so great -- you can get information from it you can't get anywhere else.

2007-11-03 11:49:00 · answer #1 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 8 1

You have to put yourself in the daughters position. They had just seen the world they knew destroyed. Their mother had been turned to salt and they were hiding in a cave. They did not know how far the destruction went and I am sure they were all basket cases! Had Lot been a good father they would never have been there in the first place. He also did not tell the girls they were going to another city so they were out of the loop. The daughters obviously had seen enough wickedness to corrupt them in their way of thinking. Finally, they wanted to restock the Earth and their father was the only man as far as they knew it.

As far as the drunken incest party. Well, you can hardly say God approved because the tribes that came of this relation are the ones God order the Israelites to kill every man, woman, and child. Also every man can tell you that he responds involuntary in that particular region. Whether he was plastered or passed out the end result was the same. Any one that is curious and do not have the aversion to alcohol should test drive this theory(with their wife). Myself I prefer to be an active participant and do not intend to look into it further than the Biblical account.

2007-11-03 12:08:39 · answer #2 · answered by crimthann69 6 · 1 0

Lot's daughters were not virgins. They had husbands that refused to leave with Lot and the family but instead mocked. So they went out without the husbands and because childless married women were without honor they betrayed their father with this plan so they could have children. Their fathers was unaware

35And they made their father drink wine that night also: and the younger arose, and lay with him; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.

They didn't go in there with thier father to have a good old time of raunch and foreplay. They went in to get pregnant. The two of them together prolly would have woke him and not achieved the goal because we all know how fast men recover for a second go around. I hate to be so graphic but you asked. These women planned it out together. They probably didn't have much time and took turns one night and then the next. There are women who have sued and pressed charges in court because they were drugged or too drunk to realize or protect themselves from being victemized. A man, any man, can be done the same way...and there have been cases where a man has been taken advantage of. Pediphiles have often given alcohol to their victems...I don't know why you find this concept SO incredulous EXCEPT that it prolly fits in with your bias against the Bible. Recorded instances such as these prove more so the authenticity of the Bible rather than support such accusations that it has been doctored. Why wouldn't these accounts have been omitted due to their questionable content? Why hasn't instances such as this been suger coated? Because they would conspicuous by their absense..."oh everybuddy back in biblical times was so dern perfect..." Well, they weren't and it was well documented. Love in Christ, ~J~

2007-11-03 12:06:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Have you ever known someone who got so drunk they don't even remember driving home? Some people have drunk so much liquor that they just blacked out. So to answer your question: Yes, he was too drunk to know, more than likely because they were in a cave at the time and there was no lighting, which made things more confusing and blurry, and the reason for doing it twice, both daughters thought that they and their father were the only ones alive after God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, so to keep the population going, they mated with their father.

2007-11-03 11:55:05 · answer #4 · answered by Eddie 2 · 0 0

I am not sure about the sordid details. However, God can redeem even that mess. Ruth the Moabite (the decedents of Lot and the girls) married Boaz and was King David's great grandmother. Therefore in the linage of Jesus.

2007-11-03 11:58:42 · answer #5 · answered by δοῦλος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ 5 · 1 0

Lot did no longer got down to get under the effect of alcohol. And who hasn't had slightly too lots wine at sometime? additionally, his daughters have been very worried approximately his lineage. He had no sons, his daughter's fiances does no longer go away Sodom and that they did no longer be attentive to in the event that they might have husbands or infants. there became no regulation against incest at that element. examine the Bible and you will discover God gave the rustic of Israel rules related to incest yet that became hundreds of years later. people have been lots nearer to perfection and there have been no longer the genetic defects to difficulty them, nor God, for sure. whilst it grew to become undesirable, he condemned it. Lot's daughter's difficulty for their father's call and line being persevered became their in common terms reason, in accordance to the Bible. And it would not say it happened extra beneficial than as quickly as.

2016-09-28 06:49:42 · answer #6 · answered by quellette 4 · 0 0

Not heard about this one, has it been in the daily papers?

If his defence is "I was drunk your Honour" no way Jose

When is the case up before the court???

ROVE..... You having a fantasy about handcuffs etc.?

2007-11-03 12:03:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

There are a lot of passages in the bible that read like a trashy novel that you need to hide under your bed. (Or a Desperate Housewives script) I like spice.

2007-11-03 11:57:43 · answer #8 · answered by absent farmer 6 · 1 0

No. He just had folks in high places that accepted and even justified the incest. And of course those same upper echelons blamed the victimized daughters.

2007-11-03 11:49:41 · answer #9 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 3 0

Well that's the result of him not obeying the angels and going where they said to go in the first place. Disobedience to God leads to sin. that's the moral of the story. He's a man he probalby couldn't resist if they were seducing him. :)

2007-11-03 11:53:33 · answer #10 · answered by sisterzeal 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers