Christians are deluded.
2007-11-03 11:30:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
To explain this, first you should know few thinks 1. if we divide any number X with the same number X we always getting 1 (one), so 1/1 = 2/2 = 3/3 = 4/4 = ... = X/X = 1 (where X is any number you like, but 0(zero)) 2. If we multiply any number Y with 1 (one), we get the same number (Y) eg. 1x1=1, 2x1=2, 3x1=3, ..., Y x 1 = Y (where Y is any number but 0 (zero)) 3. The smallest number that could be divided in the same time with 3 and 5 is 15 (this would be new denominator for 1/3 and 2/5) As we write before 1/3 = 1/3 x 1 = 1/3 x 5/5 = 5/15 and 2/5 = 2/5 x 1 = 2/5 x 3/3 = 6/15 Now, if we substitute this, we will get: 1/3 + 2/5 = 5/15 + 6/15 = (5+6)/15 = 11/15 So, the answer is: 1/3 + 2/5 = 11/15 You got it? This was the longest explanation i ever give :-) Have a nice day, Toni M.
2016-05-27 05:34:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Current Scientific Evidence Is Pointing To An Earth That Is MUCH YOUNGER Than Was Previously Believed And Those Skeletons Of 'So-Called' Pre-Historic Men Were Recreated From Only A Handfull Of Bones And Bone Pieces That They Used To Extrapolate (Guess At) What They Looked Like. Even Carbon Dating Has Come Into Question As To How Accurate It Is As Measurement Of Time. They Still Haven't Accurately Determined How Long Ago Adam And Eve Lived (Even The Bible Lacks Enough Info For This) So How Can Anyone Say These Skeletons Are Older?
2007-11-03 11:35:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by one 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Judaism, and later Christianity, are a group of mythical stories told by nomadic tribes in the Middle East. Those myths have been disproved time and agan by scientists and historians. I'd like to recommend you read a book called "The Immense Journey" by Loren Eisely. He is a scientist who can write and his book will answer lots of questions for you.
2007-11-03 11:31:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by A Plague on your houses 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
The bible wasn't written as a "how to" manual, or even a scientific book of "facts," but rather an allegory that teaches you how to live your life well. Religions tend to take what is good, the bible, and turn it into something bad by micro-analizing it. There are truths in there, but they're not in the minutia.
2007-11-03 11:34:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You have it in a nut shell read a history book by man or the bible by God.[2 Tim.3:16Inspired by God and beneficial for teaching]
2007-11-03 11:31:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by oatesmokid 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
people or apes? and what testing method for time is being used. You can't make such a brush stroke statement really.
2007-11-03 11:33:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is more than one scripture about the origin of man and more than one scientific evidences also.
Who to believe? Is up to you.
http://www.lalive.info/flash/HiddenHistoryPart1-512.htm
http://www.lalive.info/flash/originsofman512.htm
2007-11-03 13:05:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just one of the many contradictions where religious teachings differ from history and science.
2007-11-03 11:32:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Never did the Bible say Adam and E ve were the first.
2007-11-03 11:35:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Royal Racer Hell=Grave © 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I'll let the Christians type. I have more questions than you about this, which is why I am atheist.
2007-11-03 11:27:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋