I don't get this other thing with evolution, either...?

Question

If brunch came from lunch, why is there still breakfast...?

Answer 1

because people need an excuse to eat

Answer 2

Wait! Hold on: First Breakfast, or Second Breakfast? It helps if you become more familiar with the species line of meals.

First Breakfast. Then Second Breakfast. Followed by Brunch. Then we have Lunch. Second Lunch. Lunner. Dinner. Second Dinner.

That, of course, doesn't account for snacks.

Answer 3

You forgot to employ the whole elevenses factor, without this your hypothesis falls flat on its face.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elevenses


All becomes so much clearer with tea , what what


This is what the Victorians had for meals

Breakfast
Second breakfast
Elevenses
Brunch
Tiffin
Lunch
Tea
Dinner
Supper
Dessert
Snack

Answer 4

Breakfast comes way before brunch. Its still its own separate entity...there is nothing wrong with more excuses to eat. Think about it...Taco Bell was right up my alley when they invented "fourth meal"

Answer 5

"No seriously" seems to be missing the t. Since this question is here and not in Biology I take it you're trying to have a go at evolution. Try this web site:

http://www.talkorigins.org/

Answer 6

Somehow, I'm suddenly reminded of the joke: Do you know what the difference is between sex and Caesar salad?

No?

Well then...care to have lunch with me tomorrow?

;-)

Answer 7

It's a mystery, baby. Much like if Protestants came from Catholics, why are there still Catholics?

Answer 8

And if Americans originally came from England, then why are there still Englishmen?

Time for another *drink* . . . .