Some people feel that they have the right to exact revenge on certain type of criminals due to the nature of the crime even if or their families were not a victim. However why is that few people who commit vigilante justice dont target gangsters and officers who have commited heinous crimes such as murder.
2007-11-03 06:21:08 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
YOU DO NOT KNOW MUCH DO YOU.
GANGSTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS HAVE BEEN KILLED FOR LESS THEN MURDER. SNITCHING ON THE OTHERS INVOLVED.
WHY DO YOU THINK YOU HAVE A WITNESS STATEMENT. SO THAT WHEN YOU GO TO COURT, AND THE WITNESS HAS BEEN KILLED, YOU CAN SUBPOENA THE STATEMENT AS EVIDENCE.
2007-11-03 06:32:26 · answer #1 · answered by ahsoasho2u2 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
People often target gangsters in vigilante justice.
They usually end up getting killed, because the gangsters are organized and better armed.
2007-11-03 07:08:37 · answer #2 · answered by CGIV76 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
tell that to a father who watch the killer of his child walk out of the courtroom scot free because of a technicality. or a victim of a crime who was victimized twice because there wasn't enough evidence and the perp was never charged defend themselves because they feel the cops won't do it for them. maybe people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones and maybe you shouldn't go around calling people cowards because until you put yourself in their shoes and feel the fear and horror that the memories of the crime have put them through, you have absolutely no idea how they feel
2007-11-03 07:14:07 · answer #3 · answered by rebel with a cause 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They are usually brave individuals that are misguided. There is a very fine line between hero and perpetrator in these situations.
2007-11-03 07:34:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋