I live in Washington state & the legislation up here has already killed the idea of a track in this state.The greedy azzholes want the money a track would bring in but don't want to help pay for it with state funds.
I am hoping somewhere in the Northwest, maybe Oregon or Idaho. The weather is alot better then westerm Wa & not as crowded with traffic.
Who ever said to put it near Seatac close to Boeing obviously doesn't live up here because there is no Boeing plant near Seatac!! The closest Boeing plant is either in Renton or south Seattle at Boeing field and I see no room for a track at either place...
Our closest tracks right now are either Vegas, California or Phoenix...
GO RCR!!! GO #07!!! GO #29!!! GO #31!!!
2007-11-04 00:28:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Samslover 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
My guess would be somewhere in the Pacific northwest. That seems to be the one big area that NASCAR has no presence. I'd like to see either a 1/2-3/4 HIGH bank track, ala Bristol, or a superspeedway, something over 2 miles long.
2007-11-04 05:50:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by JustJoshin999 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Theres so many drivers from Wisconsin now..hey why not there.. I know Colorado wants a track and so does Washington . But my heart says bring back The Rock, and take Labor Day race back to "The Lady in Black" Darlington...yeah we need The Southern 500 back in Darlington, and atleast one race at The Rock...and all the Wisconsin drivers can rally together and get a track up there. Theres several places like Pocano & Calif that only needs 1 race..
2007-11-03 16:40:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Go Team Penske 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Somehwere in the west but not western washington, the race would always be rained out.
California has too many dates, they should at least modify it like Vegas did, it is the most boring of all the (unfortunate) cookie cutters .
Racing at the Rock was great why did people not sell it out??
There is already a track in NY....Watkins Glen.
I like the "southern" speedway in the nascar 2001 game in New Orleans.
2007-11-03 21:31:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Step into the Freezer 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Louisiana would be a great place for a Nascar track. Baton Rough area
2007-11-05 10:55:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Washington d.c. baby call it the capital 600 that would be sweet make it a 2.7 mile super speedway then it would be the biggest have just about 5 miles from the white house i would go and i live in mi
2007-11-03 15:00:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
as a approaches as a results of fact the Washington section is going, the belief became shot down some weeks in the past as a results of fact the State refuses to help build a music, i think of this is silly, it may generate a great form of money for the state, this is been shown, One think of concerning the northwest i'm curious approximately is the rain there...
2016-11-10 03:41:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Out of Eau Claire, Wisconsin. It's right on interstate 94, less than an hour from Minneapolis/St Paul. It would be a big draw for people from Minnesota, Wisconsin and would even pull a few Canadians down for the races. Paul Menard's daddy should build him a track there, that's where Menard's is headquartered anyway and he has the dough to do it.
2007-11-03 07:35:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tregosteevo 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
I would love to see a track in seattle, they were trying to build one but gave up. Or Northern Oregon. Because the northwest has no tracks nearby at all. and Right now seattle is the biggest city for tourism or people looking to move there.
2007-11-03 06:11:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by lyn p 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
You are right, put a track in N.Y. I live in CT, so since we will be losing 1 race, maybe 2 at New Hampshire, a track close by would be great. A 7/8 mile medium banked track would be ideal.
2007-11-03 07:35:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by mike the dj 5
·
0⤊
5⤋