I think it's a great idea. So many of Israels Jews don't believe in God, anyway, what do they care about the religious aspects of it?
On the other hand, why should they trade Israel for a chunk of america, when Jews already run the american government?
2007-11-03 09:02:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by norcalislam 3
·
6⤊
6⤋
to Ultra National: "Jews have a claim to Israel that is over 4,000 years? You have a claim of what ? Roughly 1,000 years"
You'r wrong their, the Hebrews went in their and took over the place where the caanites this. They merged with the caanites through cultural assimilation and even then any jewish "state" that existed their didnt last that long.
The assyrians i think it was had a longer rein over the land then yo people did back then, so by that logic assyrians have just as much a claim as you guys.
Anyway most jewish people of today are European descended even you Ultra National problem dont have any of the blood of the people of 4000 years ago if you do its not enough even to fill a tea spoon.
Most jews are descended from converts and have very little leniage connecting them to this land.
The Palestinians however are descended from the caanites, the ancient hebrews and the other people who settled this land including the "crusaders" the very fact that there where other people who had a continous presecence in the area for 4000 years and never left means they have the blood of all these people running in their vains unlike the ashekanizis who have probably no connection to this land through blood whatsoever.
2007-11-03 09:28:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
the idea rose several times over the 19th century beginning of the 20th and was rejected by the jewish people as a whole (through the zionist congress)
mordehay imanuel noah tried to make a jewish state in the US
baron hirsch tried in argentina
and even herzl thought about uganda.
some even considered cyprus.
it doesnt work because historically the jewish people sees itself bound to the land of israel.
it's not something that can be explained through logic, but it's just there.
2007-11-03 05:09:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by joe the man 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Jews have a claim for a homeland in the Middle East - such a thing does not exist here within the sovereign lands of the USA - we already have such things in the USA - they are called Native American tribal lands - this is why so many native americans have been able to build casinos in areas that states don't give saction for. Get a clue please.
If the Middle East understood how we deal with Native American claims in the USA they would accept the existance of the Modern State of Israel in their midst instead of being criminal in their behavior.
Good Luck!!!
2007-11-03 04:55:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
It's a ridiculous proposal and not something that Israel is interested. Perhaps the Palestinians would like to put their country in America, but not Israel.
EDIT: Eu citizen, your historical and genetic 'facts' are pure speculation and at odds with real history and fact. For starters, the Israelite kingdoms lasted for centuries, whereas Assyrian control of the region did not, and in fact only refers to northern Israel. The Judean kingdom, capital Jerusalem, existed from roughly 1000 BCE to 586 BCE when it was conquered by the Babylonians, and then once again from 586 BCE to 70 CE when it was conquered by the Romans. The Jewish people held the land for over 1000 years, much longer than any other people currently in existence. On a genetic level, haplotype testing has determined that Jewish genetics are remarkably similar and cohesive. In fact, non-European Jewish DNA is practically identical to European Jewish DNA, debunking any claim that most Jews are descended from converts (usually claimed the Khazars), and supporting the claim that Jews are descended directly from the ancient Israelites.
2007-11-03 06:13:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Michael J 5
·
4⤊
4⤋
How about the Palestinians going back to there ancestral lands back in Syria, Iraq and Egypt, and the Jews keeping there ancestral lands in Israel?
2007-11-03 13:59:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think we cant say more here, the Jews already invading USA, they control the government , control the oil price, even in here too. So what the hack about moving them in US, since there are in US. !!
2007-11-04 03:14:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by ironlady42 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How about we carve out a section of Saudi Arabia and send all the Palestinians their?
Most of it is empty dessert anyways, and they will be closer to Mecca.
When you agree with me on this idea I will agree with you on yours.
2007-11-03 12:24:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gamla Joe 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
JASMINE: Didn't we (Muslims) once take Mecca by force as well? it wasn't OUR land, it belonged to the non-Muslims.
aren't we occupying other peoples lands? The victor gets the spoils. we beat them. we took Mecca.
I'm not sure HOW exactly Israel occupied their land... but in the end... they are in it... that means they won.
PAPERBACK: I agree with your view on the lobby's in America and the UK.
I was never the sentimental type, so the Jews wanting to stay in their ancestral and doesn't appeal to me. But hey... its your fight.
I just don't understand why people who have no connection to this want to start arguing. Peace people... show an example. someone should create a site called hate.com where you can go and rant all day.
The thing i liked about paperback's answer was the mannerism she used. not straight out rude and keeping a cheerful aura. keep it up.
Shame
2007-11-03 06:39:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rastafarianhobo 4
·
4⤊
5⤋
Plan denied. Israel has a right to exist. Moving it is not an option. Palestinians also have a right to exist. They should live together peacefully.
2007-11-03 08:57:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Janice 4
·
4⤊
3⤋