I heard this from a few older people, and they said the bible states if a women (Hilliary) becomes president, the end of the world is here. I don't know if president or leader is the term used, but does anyone else know anything about this. If so, can you point out where it states that, or give me a link on the internet so I can read for myself. Thank you in advance!
2007-11-02 23:21:10 · 17 answers · asked by Billy 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Okay seriously, I am not believing the ppl that told me this, obviously that is why I am here asking, another thing... not necessarily Hilliary becoming president... any women ruling the world
2007-11-02 23:35:21 · update #1
Yes it's true but you haven't quoted it properly.... THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT WILL NOT EXIST. This means no more wars, no more guns, no more violence..... There you have it.
2007-11-02 23:50:13 · answer #1 · answered by Neville 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
1
2016-12-24 04:20:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Completely fallacious.
Here is the scripture to which they may be referring:
Revelations 17 - http://scriptures.lds.org/en/rev/17/1,4-5#1
Read the whole chapter in context, and I'm sure you will not be able to conclude that voting a woman president into office means the end of the world! Someone (rather sexist) has been playing with the minds of the old folks.
P.S. The "whore" mentioned in Rev. 17 is figurative. It is not an actual woman... but more like a representation of the attitudes that have spread to people all over the world. Whoredom is a state of complete self-abandon.... the opposite of self-control.
2007-11-02 23:42:57 · answer #3 · answered by MumOf5 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel (where the Bible takes place) has already had a woman as president. The world did not end.
No countries in the world had presidents back then -- so I doubt that the Bible said anything about this.
I will assume that you are very young -- so won't call you an idiot like the other people here.
2007-11-02 23:36:56 · answer #4 · answered by Ranto 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The United States is not mentioned in the Bible because it will not play a major factor in the end times. The Bible does say however that a man should be the head of his house and this is meant to include companies and countries.
2007-11-02 23:29:16 · answer #5 · answered by Patrick E 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You need to stop hanging out with hysterical old Republicans. Seriously, where does it say that in the Bible (which, incidentally, was written thousands of years before there was a United States of America)? A lot of people say a lot of stupid garbage is in the Bible that isn't there at all -- and which, really, is an insult to Christianity.
2007-11-02 23:29:23 · answer #6 · answered by AmuseYourself.com 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
definitely although, elegance does lie contained in the eyes of the beholder. women persons's visual charm replaced with the evolution of prefer and trend. Fifty years in the past, it became seen extra acceptable for females persons to have a splash meat on their bones. on the instant, human beings try to look skinny as that's what the media prefers in recent times. So, it relies upon. in my view, i do no longer think of so. i've got not got lots of a decision, in all possibility because of the fact i'm a girl.
2016-09-28 06:05:24 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no Presidents of the United States mentioned in the bible. There are no leaders of the United States mentioned in the bible.
Please don't believe such crap.
2007-11-02 23:25:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What a load of garbage. People have been interpreting and reinterpreting the Bible and Revelations for 2,000 years now, and they have been wrong every time. They always will be.
2007-11-04 06:04:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You need some new friends.
Not that I don't think that Hillary becomming President won't mean the beginning of the end, mind you...
2007-11-02 23:26:47 · answer #10 · answered by SDW 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOLOL I doubt the gods care about human politics. LOL
I'd think they'd be more concerned over Hitlers and Stalins than Clintons. lol
2007-11-03 00:03:10 · answer #11 · answered by Joe S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋