Three ways.
1) Use three solid copper coax cables (RG6 or RG59) with RCA connectors on the ends and hook up as component cables. The connectors are easily purchased at radio shack or on line.
2) Use the coax between a UHF antenna and an HD TV with a built in digital tuner to get locals in digital and HD.
3) Move the satellite box or cable box to the TV and use the coax to feed the signal to the box.
You didn't provide a lot of information. If you have something like a cable or satellite box, you need component, DVI, VGA (in some cases) or HDMI to get HD to your TV from the box.
TIP: If you have phone wire (cat5e), you can send HD over that using baluns. See link below.
Good Luck!
2007-11-02 15:21:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Stop Ranting 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are feeding the TV from an antenna or your CATV service, ordinary RG6 coax with "F" connectors is what you use. But the TV must have a built-in tuner.
If you have a HD box like a Sat receiver or CATV box, these devices convert things to Audio & Video. So you must run Audio & Video cables from the box to the TV.
HDMI is the simple way to go because 1 cable carries both video and audio. And it's cheaper. A 10 ft component cable from a good place is about $50. A 10 ft HDMI cable from the same place is $38.
2007-11-02 17:00:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Grumpy Mac 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
HD doesn't work with coax. You need a component video cable or HDMI cable. HDMI is a lot better because one cable does it all, video and sound, while with component video you also need a second audio cable. Go to eBay to buy a long HDMI - you can get a 50 ft cable for $10 to $15. 50 ft from a store would be very expensive.
2007-11-02 15:23:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Michael da Man 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I requested this similar question when I were given my 1080p hi-def television. First, we used commonplace coax cables and the photo high quality changed into ok, yet i did not experience it changed into just about as good because the universal I talked about contained in the keep. So then I talked about as my cable organization and switched the cable container and upgraded my cable service to "extreme def" and it turned right into a lot more advantageous. Then, the cable technician instructed us that if we would have beloved the superb high quality from our 1080p, we needed to get both HDMI or aspect cables. I talked about as my brother, who's particularly of a techno geek and he reported an analogous aspect yet reported the version between the HDMI and aspect cables has to do with the HDMI in easy words having both cables, making it less complicated (plus HDMI more advantageous extreme priced). We were given the aspect cables plus a extreme-def audio cable for optimal sound high quality. the version changed into superb. So i'd say in case you pick to get the optimal high quality out of your 1080p television, you would possibly want to get both HDMI or aspect cables (and also extreme-def audio cable). And by technique of ways, at the same time as staring at dvd's, except you've a Blue-Ray participant, you nonetheless gained't get 1080p high quality, yet nonetheless good (like perhaps 720p high quality) because the dvd technologies merely isn't there yet. you'll really get more advantageous high quality staring at extreme-def cable or satellite tv for pc service.
2016-10-23 07:23:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He comprado muchas veces cables hdmi de sitios web, porque siempre tienen los mejores precios por una calidad excelente, el ultimo que compre fue un cable hdmi de alta velocidad con Ethernet, 3D y canal de retorno de audio, súper precio para un producto de calidad.
2014-12-13 11:39:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You won't get HD with coax
2007-11-02 15:19:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
for High Def you need a component cable or an hdmi cable.
2007-11-02 15:19:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by sdh0407 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
HDTV performs best with component video cable (red, green, blue) and optical audio (I know it sounds odd) cable.
2007-11-02 15:22:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by One Love 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
you don't
2007-11-02 15:19:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ed L 4
·
0⤊
1⤋