I don't think so. Morality requires free will. If there is no "ghost in the machine," as some antitheists refer to the soul, we are nothing more than the sum of our genetic parts and environmental interactions. We brought neither into existence.
Francis Crick says that our choices seem "free will to you, but it's the result of things you are not aware of." The ideas is that all our thoughts, emotions and actions are merely the results of material causes.
2007-11-02
14:54:43
·
7 answers
·
asked by
spaintola
1
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Please give me arguments for why we can have morality without free will or free will with nothing more than material components and interactions.
2007-11-02
15:14:29 ·
update #1
yair,
fine thoughts, but our internal decision process is nothing more than effects of material causes. That's Crick's point. What's the basis of value judgments for an existence that is nothing more than the interaction of atoms and energy? There is no moral, immoral. It's just matter interacting.
2007-11-02
15:26:57 ·
update #2