From the following list who would be most likely and least likely?

Question

to be an impartial government leader for the benefit of ALL the people:-

Muslim
Jew
Bhuddist
Christian
Hindu
Atheist
Agnostic

Answer 1

Most likely, Agnostic, followed by Atheist, Bhuddist, and Jew. Least likely, Muslim, followed by Christian, Hindu, and Jew.

Edit: I myself am an atheist, and I believe in the freedom for each to practice their own religion as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of others to be free from those religions. I would not be for a Jew having to celebrate or take part in Christmas festivities any more than I would be for a Christian to have to observe Muslim practices. In my eyes, freedom of religion is a personal right, not an entitlement to be made mandatory for the public to observe.

In short, you're free to practice your own religion personally and in groups, and everyone else is free to be free of it.

Edit 2: stateofaffairs83, I find your comment an unfair assessment. Atheists for the most part don't want to ban all religions, they just want for their lives to be uneffected by them. In essense, they don't want to have to acknowledge the existence of gods they don't believe in any more than Christians don't want to have to acknowledge the existence of gods they don't believe in. The difference is that atheists don't believe in any gods, while Christians do. Atheists say "you're free to do as you please, just don't try to make me do it too" while Christians say "acknowledge OUR god in everything, but no one elses." There's a huge difference.

Answer 2

Christians are more likely to be and impartial government. While Atheist , Jew and Muslim more impartial key terms include the bennefit of ALL the people? Hindu Bhuddist Agnostic may strattle the fence?

Answer 3

Any one of these who respected the right of the people not to have a Government tell them how to pray.
Osama Bin Luaden and the men who slammed planes into buildings want a state religion and forced prayer in schools.
Isn't it funny that the Christian Right in the united states agrees with The terrorists On just about every issue, except what religion the state will force people to believe in.
This is just a fact look at the issues
Gay rights
abortion
prayer in schools
no freedom of speech
no freedom of religion
no free expression
A theocracy with one unquestioned ruler "BUSH"
stricter and harsh punishment for criminals. Guilty cops are always right.
the list goes on and on.

Answer 4

maybe one in a billion atheists could handle impartially running a goverment vs 0.99 in a billion for the religious types. Who has run an impartial government in the past? Anyone?

by the way you can be unbiased by religion, but be very biased by what benefits you, your family, your friends, etc, any of the various groups you can belong to

Answer 5

Probably agnostic would be most likely to be best
Any of the others would probably be equally likely to be the worst

However, any individual from any of the groups could easily be a very good or very bad government leader. It really comes to down to what type of believer they are in their faith. If they are a fundamentalist of any religion, they should not be trusted. If someone of any religion insists that their religious texts are perfect and literal, they should not be trusted. If someone declares that their religion is the only true religion, they should not be trusted.

Answer 6

i'd mission this order: Sociologist Economist healthcare professional Anthropologist Biologist Mathematician Physicist Astronomer From Anthropologist to Astronomer, they may be highly a lot both atheists. Economists and sociologists are more advantageous of a 'comfortable' technological know-how. did you recognize what the definition of an economist is? that's someone who tells you what is going to ensue, and later is able to describe why his predictions were incorrect.

Answer 7

Agnostic
Bhuddist
I would trust them as mostly partial for the benefit of all people
then
Hindu
and thereafter
Christian, Muslims,Jews and Atheists on the exact same level, by the way.

Answer 8

athiest.

provided they don't prohibit others from believing (true athiests), then religion will have no connection to governing.

if laws are created, they are created for a secular purpose for the betterment of society.

if those laws happen to clash with religion, it is unintentional and the law must supercede any religious beliefs as they were created for the benefit of all, not a select group.

Answer 9

I think there are some people in every group who could be fair and impartial - and some who could not.

Answer 10

Most impartial -- Buddhist

Least impartial -- Hard to tell, it's a crap shoot.

Peace be with you.