is world war 3 really on it's way?

Answer 1

While Bush may strike the 'choke' points of the Iranian nuke-building process, the mere act will spark a regional conflict. It will not result in a world war with the resulting full scale nuclear exchange, only because the leaders of the major super powers are rational and still believe in MAD.

Unfortunately, WWIII will be global suicide, therefore in answer to your question, as long as there's rational superpowers who believe in MAD, there will be no WW3. By definition, the next world war wil be nuclear, how could it not. In a nuclear war there will be no winner. In a nuclear world, the only true enemy is war itself.

The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not if both sides believe no price for victory will be too high. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.

Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask what country would be victorious, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.

While we hear talk of a nuclear-Iran or a confrontation with NorKor, little is said about the 2 bulls in the glass shop. The arsenals of Russia and the US are enough to destroy a million Hiroshimas. But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Our biggest threat is from an accidental launch by the Russians.

At the point of global suicide, it doesn't matter who is on what side.... In a nuclear age like i said before, the only true enemy is war itself.

Answer 2

Okay, now allow me reply your query appropriately. First, Armageddon is truthfully the location wherein the last struggle will take location, now not the occasion of the arena finishing. It's a distinct valley (often known as Megiddo) external Jerusalem. COULD that last struggle be related to WWIII? Yes and no. The global main as much as the End shall be riddled with wars, tsunamis, earthquakes... But as it is one struggle and now not an exact conflict, it is difficult to name it that. Also, the struggle occurs after the Rapture, which hasn't occurred but. Since nobody however God is aware of while the Rapture is, we might have a WWIII the next day and feature the Rapture take location hundreds and hundreds of years from now. Hope this is helping.

Answer 3

NO, WWIII started in 1979 with the taking of the American Embassy in Tehran, Iran and the 9/11 attacks on American soil by AlQa'ida terrorists!

Answer 4

There will never be an all out war..man is destroying himself with stupidity...doesn't want to listen or see the facts starring in the face and will slowly deteriorate as the world is now....go pump more gas, poop in the water and shut up...

Answer 5

I know that in August of 1985, I was stationed on the former border between the former East Germany and West Germany, and WW III was supposed to have started that month.

Sorry, but it didn't happen then, so I doubt it will happen anytime soon.

Answer 6

I believe the world is headed that way.

Answer 7

no, I'd say the probibility of a world war happening again is very small.

Answer 8

no,the world can't take it,this thing right now is only a police action,so don't worry

Answer 9

What do you call the current war on terror ?!!

Answer 10

i think so coz world is becoming a mess