English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

That reminds me. I really miss Church Lady.

2007-11-02 08:30:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Of course he was human. A scientist. Now, let me just get this straight: the theory of evolution doesn't go against religion unless you're like a grown up child who takes everything literally. Furthermore, there can be a God and still the Bible (New Testament apart, since it is a positive philosophy book most of all) be old Jewish tales. If the Bible is a story there can still be a God, ok? Or not! But there can! The theory of evolution, God, whatever, everything is perfectly fine with me and the ones don't exclude the others. Whatever happened to education in America with all these primitive brainless nonsensical creationists that can only be compared to the radical muslims they so hardly criticize? Is this the people that want to teach the rest of the world? I hope you can do better than that!

2007-11-02 15:46:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Evolutionizer?

2007-11-02 15:33:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What 'evolutionizer' doesn't believe that?

I would guess none of them. Which begs the question how you came to the conclusion that some do. I would further guess you made it up (i.e. lied). I would further guess you did so because you don't believe in evolution and will say anything to try to support your beliefs.

If that is true, you are a liar and have violated one of the ten commandments. (Bearing false witness.) Not that this sort of thing matters to people like you.

2007-11-02 15:31:44 · answer #4 · answered by Mojo 5 · 1 0

I know he's human. Why is every Christian's argument that "scientists are only humans?" Just because SOME humans, mainly you, aren't smart enough to collect evidence of something OTHER than some non-descript "spirit" waving his hands and making everything happen, doesn't mean SOME of us humans aren't.

2007-11-02 15:33:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We all know that Darwin was only human, that is why we are Atheist. It's Christians that can't get the human/god thing figured out.

2007-11-02 15:30:26 · answer #6 · answered by Blue girl in a red state 7 · 4 0

We have realized it all along.

When will you realize your god is a myth? And what the heck is an "evolutionizer?"

2007-11-02 15:34:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

In response to Scourge_of_Fascism's answer: Yes, maybe Darwin's "theory" has stood the test of time. But how long exactly does it take for something to be considered standing the test of time? If that's your basis for believing something, then you should check out the Bible. It's been around a few more years than Darwin has.

2007-11-02 15:59:24 · answer #8 · answered by Mel 6 · 1 3

He was a genius human for realizing Natural Selection in evolution.

2007-11-02 15:29:51 · answer #9 · answered by Beletje_vos AM + VT 7 · 2 0

I want to be the Evolutionizer bunny.

2007-11-02 15:30:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Only human, but his insights in biology have stood the test of time, and are denied not for scientific reasons but theological (myhtological) ones.

2007-11-02 15:32:34 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers