English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.topix.net/forum/world/denmark/TED1BBRS1G57MJKNC

2007-11-02 07:12:26 · 13 answers · asked by rapturefuture 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

13 answers

Dear All

As A muslim I am obliged to answer this question as the alegations on Holy quran and Islam are wrong and lies.

Mr. wilders is a fascist and he interpreted the Holy Quran verse wrong and out of context and placed only the part of the Holy verses in that regard .

Wilders also said several chapters in the Quran "call on Muslims to oppress, persecute or kill Christians, Jews, dissidents and non-believers, to beat and rape women and to establish an Islamic state by force".

Brothers let me explain to you in detail about thes false claims.

There were wars between Disbelievers of Makkah and Muslims as thos people have persecuted Muslims for years and they were helpless. Those verses are in that time of war with them and were not applicable after that time. It was a part of History explained .

There was an agreement between Jews of Madinah city and Muslims that they will not help Disbelievers of Makkah against Muslims, but they violated the agreement. Hence they were killed as per the Holy Verdict of their Own Holy Book Torah as they asked for it. If they would have appealed to Muhammad peace be on him, he might have pardoned them.

Islam and Holy Quran never ordered to rape or kill women and children. It is a Lie by wilders Fascist.

In fact Islam is the first religion which framed the rules of War not to kill civilians men, women and children,animals and even cutting down fruit bearing trees.

Raping irrespective they being women of enemey or not, is a heinous crime and the punishment in Islam is that the offender should be stoned to death.

In fact Bible had a clear commandment to kill innocent men, women, children, infants and even cattle, read as follows:

This is a verse from Holy Bible Book of Samuel, Chapter 15:3
(King James Version).

Now go and smite Amalek and utterly destroy all that they have; and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ***.

Let Denmark severe ties with Muslim Countries and not do business with them if they are so concerned.

2007-11-02 09:41:16 · answer #1 · answered by mohammad a 5 · 0 0

Im laughing. You know why?

even if the Quran was banned (which would be stupid thing in the first place ) it wouldnt make a difference because there are like thousands of people who know the Quran off by heart, therefore the Quran would just carry on being passed down generation to generation the way it started before the Quraan was actually written.ie by memorising it.

2007-11-02 11:28:46 · answer #2 · answered by deen.queen 3 · 1 0

The Freedom Party is tiny in Holland, adhered to only by a fringe of racists. It's odd that someone so far to the right would talk about fascism in a bad sense.

And no, the Koran shouldn't be banned. We in the West have a long and noble tradition of religious freedom; we shouldn't drop that because of a few extremists.

2007-11-02 07:20:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If America bans the Qur'an, it will no longer be a country of freedom of religion, which was written in the Constitution of the United States. Besides that, it would mean to wage war against the Muslims, and that won't look to pretty.

2007-11-02 08:04:58 · answer #4 · answered by Authentic Believer (SOA) 4 · 1 0

In America, this couldn't happen. It doesn't suprise me so much from the Netherlands after the outcry received from that taboo cartoon a few months back. Perhaps their just fed up with people being so sensitive. It's their country. It has nothing to do with me.

Denying freedom of religious beliefs is a bad thing, but I'm not sure of their motivations. From that article is would seem he is just bigotted towards Muslims.

2007-11-02 07:22:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

no, it should not

should the dictionary be banned if someone disagrees with it

and if this question is related to terrorism, no it shouldnt

all religions have fundamentalist extremeists. and according to some christian movements (this comes from a commandment) all children who disrepspect(defininition open to interpretation) their parents should be killed


and the american above me would not be pleased to learn that the bible is banned in the middle east because it is not a true religion according to islam

and the crusades killed millions, twin towers claimed thousands, weight them up

2007-11-02 07:18:45 · answer #6 · answered by Kieran H 1 · 2 0

Banning books is bad. It is a form of policing thought. What makes the US great is that we are free to seek out knowledge and learn as we see fit.
I wish more people used that right.

2007-11-02 07:19:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

So you are coming from a free society!!! Bloody civilized world!! Islam shall continue to grow in the fasted rate because it is true.

2007-11-02 07:21:03 · answer #8 · answered by NOW HURRICANE 2 · 0 0

No religious book should ever be banned.

They quote the person as saying it should be banned 'as Mein Kampf is banned' - is Hitler's book banned? It shouldn't be.

You don't silence bad arguments, you refute them with a good argument.

2007-11-02 07:15:31 · answer #9 · answered by Leviathan 6 · 4 0

In America its a good thing. We suffered several times at the hands of those believers, including the twin towers. The bible is not allowed in some Arab countries including Saudi Arabia.

2007-11-02 07:17:24 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers