Shouldn't Bush be tried for treason?

Question

After all he swore an oath to protect the sovereinty of our country from all threats foreign and domestic. And then turns around in 05 and secretly meets with Mexico and Canada to plan the North American Union. I wish we were in colonial times, I'd like to see how our founding fathers would deal with him. I guess nobody has the guts to stand up against this. Well I'm going to learn how to speak Spanish and Mandarin Chinese.

Answer 1

Yes, he has done nothing good for this country. American are loosing their houses in record number and him and his oil buddies are raking in the bucks! Not to mention all the funking mooney he is spending on other countries instead of his own! And letting all these ILLEGAL Invaders in our country and then supporting them instead of his own citizens!

He should be (&^$(&^$ , well, I can't say that or I'd go to jail.

Answer 2

"After all he swore an oath to protect the sovereinty of our country from all threats foreign and domestic."

And so did our Senators. Anyone that has consistently voted pro amnesty needs to be included. Teddy Kennedy has been the architect of this since 1986. Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Harry Reid, Dick Durbin also come to mind.

The Chinese Government were big contributors to Bills campaign and now Hillary's. Under Bills watch the Chinese got our military secrets...hmmm wonder what they will get with Hillary? Keys to the Pentagon?

Answer 3

To the above solutions: I consider the accusation of treason will also be centered at the dying triggered by means of orchestrating/being dependable/now not having stopped the nine/eleven assaults and the deaths of that day. Also the terrorizing and manipulating of the folks of america, the terrorizing of folks in united states, making the lifetime of the islamist of united states complicated, main united states guys in to two wars for his possess improvement inflicting the dying and damage of many squaddies. Those would be accusations for treason and I consider that that is what the questioner method. My reply is :Where will you discover a court docket for that?

Answer 4

I don't know.
Maybe you can look up treason...
and tell me this:

1. Why hasn't Nancy Pelosi been tried for treason? After all, the Constitution specifically states that no one may go to a foreign nation and represent the US without the expressed permission of the President... so only the Secretary of State, VP or an Ambassador should be doing this... yet Pelosi went to Syria and then LIED to them about a supposed message from the PM of Israel, so not only did she commit treason, she embarrassed us!

2. Why hasn't Howard Dean been tried for treason? He admitted to 'having secret meetings with foreign leaders' in an interview with Politico magazine... telling them to 'ignore the current administration and just wait for Democrats to take power'
Doesn't this sound like a coup?
Where are the charges?

Before you go slapping 'treason' on someone as a charge, do some research.
I've just cited two examples of REAL treason and the simple fact that Pelosi wasn't even called upon to step down from her Speaker position for it proves how corrupt and crooked and power hungry the moveon morons are...

and what you have is a conspiracy theory based on reports and conjecture... I imagine your next charge is that the reason no border fence has been built is because the border is going away, right?


EDIT~ MissE... you did NOT just suggest assassinating the President of the United States! Please tell me you're not that deranged!

Answer 5

A hardy heck yes to that!!!

To the people saying no because others have done worse...

Or the ones who really think they can vote crime out of "our" government if there's never any punishment for it... The same treasonous plan against the people has been moving forward for years under BOTH parties. They're all on the same team!!!

I don't know what to say... Why do you want to hand this country to tyrants? Do you hate your children that much???

Answer 6

As much as I disagree with bush and his antics he has committed no punishable crimes.. We the voters are the ones who should be held liable for allowing such a man in office.. not only once but be stupid enough to re-elect him for a second term.
The blame goes on us, shame on us and we need to correct the problems (if still possible) by electing a man who has morals and understands his position and does what is best for us not the corp america. Maybe get out and vote this time and not just sit back and complain about the mess we put ourselves in by electing such a moron.

Answer 7

I feel a little differently, since such a horrendous trial...that would last as long as possible...without guarantee of outcome...would cost We the Tax Payers gazillions $$$...wouldn't assassination be less expensive & decisive, since you would have to get Bush & Chaney together, else you will simply be replacing, even if only temporarily, with the same kind of person???

Then, it boggles the mind, how this man & his regime hasn't had such an event occur already??? Makes me think that he may not be as stupid as he appears, and/or is extremely protected by his constituents for some underlying reason...the things that make ya go hmmm...LOL. My main guesstimation is that he's the perfect figurehead...does what he's told with full sacrifice of himself & our country.

No worries...one more year and he's "outta here!!!" Eeeehaaa!!! And this election will be of historic measure, I'm sure...so looking forward to it for a change...and for Change!!!

Answer 8

he is a war monger and the worst kind of alarmist.
he is in my opinion a liar and it's a shame that he was elected in the first place.
if nothing else he should be impeached.

Answer 9

We don't follow the Constitution anymore - better check the international laws for this one.

I did love Hockey's answer!

Answer 10

Yes, he SHOULD be tried for treason!

EDIT: For those of you who think that the NAU is fabrication. LOOK AT THE WRITING ON THE WALL BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE! There are government papers which prove that the NAU is in the works. And YES, the SPP DOES create the government agencies to create a new government which contains Canada, Mexico and the USA. They even have already attempted at voting a new currency here in the US in 2003! Yes, it went down, but that doesn't say that they wont try again when the dollar is weaker.

There is plans to create a parliament which will be OVER our Supreme Court!!! If that doesn't sound like a NAU, then I don't know what does!

EDIT AGAIN! Jason...You are sorely MISTAKEN if you think that BUSH is the ONLY one who is in on the creation of the NAU! Uh, HELLO! Bush Sr. was the person who signed NAFTA, and Clinton was the person who pushed NAFTA forward. All you have to do is look at the history to see what I am saying is true!