Here's some of the things they'll say:
1) We're not winning.
2) Things will get worse.
3) Bush lied
The next thing they'll start saying is that we're winning because of them! It will happen!
Would they love it if more of our brave troops died?
2007-11-02 06:14:34 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yes , big time .
1 ) Winning the war is seen as a loss for THEM and a win for Bush ..not a "win" for Freedom & Domocracy or for America or the Iraqi people .
2 ) Things are always "worse" in liberal land without them- and sure to get "worse" if they aren't in power..but if anything they seem to insure things will never change - except taxes will skyrocket to pay for all the giveaways & larger government
3 ) Their blame for everything & anything is "Bush Lied"..and the "whole world would be just perfect if" they were in office..
But miraculously 3 thousand deaths and countless injured on 9/11 ; or bombings & maimings worldwide..or Ted Kennedy getting away with the death of Mary Jo Kopechne or Clintons compromising national security & a slew of wrong-doing scandals do not "count" .
And while the nation mourned the death of former President Reagan - liberal mainstream media was telling us "We need to get back to the business of abu grabbe".
NO , Democrats do not cheer death of our brave troops ..but that don't stop them from insulting the living ones - nor does troop casualties change the fact that they still mourn abu Grabbe's blood-thirsty prisoners with underware on their heads - while voting against anything that will assist the war effort & our troops .
2007-11-02 06:59:02 · answer #1 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
each thing I examine says the Democrats are in want of the conflict in Afghanistan. As i'm confident you're conscious, when you consider which you're a nicely-examine and counseled individual, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are thoroughly diverse. diverse countries, diverse areas, diverse enemies, diverse motives for being there. yet you already knew that, did no longer you? until eventually presently, there wasn't an al-Qaeda in Iraq. Osama bin encumbered hated Saddam and vice-versa. Edit: I in simple terms examine the different solutions. apparently the previous posters do no longer understand there are 2 wars, the two. God help us.
2016-10-03 04:41:18 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know few people who truly wish that more US soldiers died. I do think many democrats believe their party will make political gains if the US does not show progress in the Iraq War. I also believe there is pretty clear evidence that we are winning. But now the ball is in the people of Iraq's hands. They must form a government, ". . . of the people, by the people, for the people. . ." or they can let sectarianism rule the day. That I see as an open question.
2007-11-02 06:20:55 · answer #3 · answered by JJHantsch 4 · 8⤊ 2⤋
You got that right , I want to hear what they say when they see what just came out a minute ago , they say talk to Iran there is not threat , Iran can be our friends , well democrats here is the report on you friends in iran ...
IRAN RUSHING TO BUILD NUKES
In an interview with The Times of London newspaper, Bahrain's Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa became the first Arab leader to directly accuse Iran of seeking nuclear weapons.
“While they don’t have the bomb yet, they are developing it, or the capability for it,” he said.
He also said “the whole region” would be caught up in any military conflict .
2007-11-02 07:07:24 · answer #4 · answered by Insensitively Honest 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I don't think that liberals and democrats want us to loose in iraq, but they just don't want us to be there, no matter what. They want the money being spent on the war to be spent on their own little pet projects, like welfare! They want government so big that no one can control what is going on inside of it, except for raising taxes and their own salaries.
They don't understand what "winning a war" is, as you don't understand it either! The USA hasn't won a war since WWII We've started a hell of a lot of them but wind up pulling our forces out of the fray, because of PC or the fact that the American Public just doesn't have the stomach for it! The list is long! Starting with Korea!, through viet-nam and now iraq. It's gonna be the same all over. When the fat cats feel they are fat enough (oil companies)we'll pull out. That's just the way it is in this as shole liberal union!
2007-11-02 06:36:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Amazing. You have no grasp of current facts, yet you have the ability to read minds and tell the future. Idiot savant, or just idiot? But you're right, we're not winning in Iraq for the simple reason there was never anything to win. Bush and his crew have manage to destabilize the Middle East. Iraq might be experiencing a brief period of relative peace, but have you checked out the news from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran lately. You remind me of the doofuses who point to the high DOW as evidence of our booming economy, then grow strangely quiet when it takes another roller-coaster plunge. Any real, substantial, sustainable peace in the Middle East won't be achieved for generations, if ever, and probably despite the U.S. not because of it.
2007-11-02 06:36:41 · answer #6 · answered by socrates 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Kimmy baby - think it's a shame people like you couldn't be embedded with our troops in Iraq and report on all the wonderful things that are happening over there the great progress, and love to have you take Ann Coulter, Freedman, & Leaberman with you.
2007-11-02 07:01:54 · answer #7 · answered by Dave M 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Good heavens! If we were to win, that would mean Bush was right! We can't have any of that kind of talk, can we?
2007-11-02 07:01:08 · answer #8 · answered by TedEx 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Where are you getting your delusion pills? Man, they must be pretty potent for you to be spouting this special brand of cluelessness.
It's difficult to answer a question based on a false premise; not only is the "war" not being won, but this isn't a war anymore, it's a schisming country, fighting along religious lines, and we're caught in the middle, patting ourselves on the back due to clever wordplay and lies.
So to conclude:
1) We're not winning.
2) Things ARE getting worse.
3) Bush lied, and continues to lie.
The next thing "we'll" start saying (even though I'm a moderate, but your 'black and white' mentality will group me with the liberals, since I'm disagreeing with your stupid argument), is that we're losing because of the atrocious neo-conservative agenda that dumped us in that quagmire in the first place.
Your conclusive question is disgusting. I would tell you that you should be ashamed of yourself for playing the part of the divisive pundit, but why waste any more time dissuading a brainwashed puppet of Fox news? Thank you for providing the world with more reasons to hate our country, a**hole.
2007-11-02 06:24:15 · answer #9 · answered by damlovash 6 · 7⤊ 6⤋
I'm not saying you're not winning. I'm asking what winning is. I have yet to hear ANYONE give a clearly defined bullet point list as to what constitutes victory. How can you win something when you don't even know what the rules are or the object of the game is?
2007-11-02 06:21:22 · answer #10 · answered by Mordent 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋