No other candidate seems willing TO DEFEND US.
2007-11-01
14:57:07
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
Wow! I&P MD just gave Ron Paul the most impressive (de facto) vote of confidence I've heard yet! This prairie fire just might be outta control!
2007-11-01
15:04:59 ·
update #1
Thanks for all answers, so far. Honestly, he sounds a little weak in debates. But, then, all the others from major parties sound like ho-ho 'z, under duress. I haven't decided yet. But he looks okay to me.
2007-11-01
15:23:15 ·
update #2
Thanks for all answers, so far. Honestly, he sounds a little weak in debates. But, then, all the others from major parties sound like ho-ho 'z, under duress. I haven't decided yet. But he looks okay to me.
2007-11-01
15:23:43 ·
update #3
ILoveGreen: Get involved early, stay sharply attuned and never lose touch. It's inspiring to see young people doing their part as Americans! Thanks!
2007-11-03
16:51:37 ·
update #4
I know that Pat Buchanan supports this. I know he endorses Ron Paul. I have though never heard him say this. I have heard him say that we must defend our borders by any means necessary though. I mean we have troops stationed all across the world and our borders are so porous that 1000s of people can enter at will. Id say that we are losing our sovereignty, but I actually fear its lost already.
There is hope this year with Ron Paul running, all the other people running are just tools of business and Friends of money.
Maybe some maverick loner guy will stir up some discussions of important issues, but once the new president takes office no meaningful changes will be made. Watered down legislation as porous as our borders will be passed "Bipartisanly" and their will be a photo op or two.Like McCain Feingold . At least there is a candidate I can fully get behind, before I read up on Paul (Thanks Patrick J Buchanan Site) I was thouroughly convinced that I couldnt give a .........
2007-11-01 15:15:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
I propose that the top cut back for contributions be completed away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nevertheless proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social protection isn't a "supply away" software yet one which all of us make contributions to love a reductions plan, and could be shielded from different makes use of via the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? while you're so worried approximately it then why do no longer you; first placed it back into the non-public sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for their very own pastime, 2d pay back each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social protection and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over right here yet in no way paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it an identical for each man or woman; in different words government officers are to take area in it and in the event that they opt for something greater they do it on their very own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had in no way been incredibly replaced. They, a team of pupils, reported that one and all expenses of pastime could be 3% or much less for each man or woman to alter into wealthy if wanted (that would desire to be genuine additionally to taces). the main suitable economic subject could be, they stated, while there have been no expenses of pastime. Why no longer try this answer? the wealthy could nevertheless be wealthy. My question is: while soial protection will become a topic linked to federal debts, why no longer artwork with a balanced or benefit budget and spend no greater beneficial than is provided in, as any relatives has to attempt for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents with a view to get rules that serve the country? God bless u . s ..
2016-11-10 00:14:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by caton 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Every Conservative should vote for Ron Paul , he is the only one running that even talks about the Constitution.
2007-11-01 15:06:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by TyranusXX 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
ill be 18 once elections come around the block....Dr. Ron Paul has got my vote....there is no thinking twice.....he is my best hope!!
2007-11-01 18:05:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by ILoveGreen ZipZapZop 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
He, Tom Tancredo, and Duncan Hunter do.
2007-11-02 03:59:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I like Ron Paul's idea's, but Ive always been told "If something sounds to good to be true, it probably is.
2007-11-01 15:05:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
Ron Paul is a fringe candidate who's sole purpose is to throw any loony libertarian support he garners to Rudy or whatever more nearly mainstream candidate wins the primary.
Sorry to disillusion you.
2007-11-01 15:03:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
1⤊
8⤋
He also wants to give 20 million illegals amnesty which is why he will never be taken seriously......
2007-11-01 15:31:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by defiler78 2
·
0⤊
7⤋