Here's how it goes...
You start with awesome, complex things in nature like the eye or life on Earth that could not have come into existence purely by random chance.
They are "obviously" creations
Creations by definition require a Creator
Therefore God exists...
Sneaky, huh?
2007-11-01 14:46:05 · 8 answers · asked by I'm an Atheist 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yeah circular logic, straw-man arguments, and mental retardation all 'round.
2007-11-01 14:49:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sneaky. Here's how they get you - they say that the same scientific criteria used to determine design in arson investigations and SETI research should also be applied to biology. Of course, there are more criteria used by SETI than just "Dude, this pulse I'm picking up is Awesome - it must be an alien lifeform!"
2007-11-01 14:53:02 · answer #2 · answered by NONAME 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, if you can define "random chance" and then prove that things could not have come into existence that way.
2007-11-01 14:49:23 · answer #3 · answered by chazzychef 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only thing sneaky is how...sneaky people are about being foolish
2007-11-01 14:49:31 · answer #4 · answered by hghostinme 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How does it prove it? Who says it couldn't be random chance? When you talk about 4.5 BILLION years, that's a long enough chance of anything happening.
2007-11-01 14:49:49 · answer #5 · answered by punch 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
now it all makes sense...
Col. Mustard in the Lounge with the Lead pipe...
got it...
2007-11-01 14:55:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Silly too, in fact it is so ridiculous it is laughable
2007-11-01 14:48:56 · answer #7 · answered by nicelyevolve 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
man we can never fool you
2007-11-01 14:50:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋